Thinking of red states vs blue states is busted. Plenty of good visualizations of this over the years, but this election in particular feels really important to point out “We” did not chose this.

When I say we I mean registered US voters, but even less so citizens, and even less so again residents.

Even of the voters who did vote for the GOP candidate, who can say how many really wanted him or his policies vs they just didn’t want more of the status quo Dems.

The popular vote tallies in this graphic are out of date too, He definitely didn’t win in a landslide the way it can appear with red and blue maps. His win in the popular vote was also pretty small now that more votes have been counted. https://www.thenation.com/…/donald-trump-vote-margin…/

So, what if Biden used broad immunity SCOTUS granted to declare a crisis of democracy - That between massive disinformation campaigns by enemies both foreign and domestic, voter suppression, as well as many other factors, the will of the people can’t be discerned from our recent presidential election. That it would be a dereliction of duty both to the people and to his oath to defend the constitution to hand over power to someone whose clear and declared intent is abuse the power of the office to fundamentally reshape or demolish our republic based on this highly suspect and incomplete result (remember, most people didn’t even vote)

Here is my off the cuff proposal for what to do after that

A new election, everyone must vote. Trump and Harris on the ballot, but each major party must offer 2 candidates, and we’re using Ranked Choice Voting. 1st place gets presidency, 2nd place gets VP.

Biden almost certainly won’t do anything like this. He is clearly a coward with a stupid sense of optimism - a “things will be just fine, no need for any drastic measures” ever, mentality, and despite some rhetoric has shown no signs that he thinks there is anything to actually be concerned about from the party which has veered hard towards fascism. But, hey, a guy can dream.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Donald Trump won the 2024 Presidential election in a free and fair election. The indisuptable fact is that 10 million or so Democrat voters chose, for whatever reason, to stay home. Your proposal essentially takes the whining that Trump has been spewing for 4 years and puts it on steroids. The 2024 election was not stolen; the American people had the chance to make their voices heard, and 10 million of them chose to say nothing. We as a country elected Trump, and now must start dealing with the consequences of that choice. Just like Trump, we don’t get a do-over if we don’t like the results.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Yeah this isn’t like the last election in Germany before the Nazis, where armed brown-shirts were standing inside the polling places and half the opposition had been arrested in advance.
      This was just a normal US election, and the result was Trump.
      After he had already said what he’s about to do. In public. Many, many times.
      And it wasn’t even close.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It wasnt exactly fair, considering Russia called in fake bomb threats to Democrat majority polling places and judges refused to extend voting hours to accommodate for the lost time.

      Not to mention all of the voter suppression that the Rs pulled, on top of the fact that many people aren’t able to stand in line for hours to vote since election day isn’t a national holiday.

    • aeischeid@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Never said it was stolen. if you have some counter to this “That between massive disinformation campaigns by enemies both foreign and domestic, voter suppression, as well as many other factors, the will of the people can’t be discerned from our recent presidential election.” I’d be interested to hear it.

      I admit by that same logic Biden, Trump or other past winners may also be invalid, but that being true of past elections, doesn’t make it not true about this one.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Technically Trump is ineligible, per the 14th amendment. By the constitution, Harris won.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      I know that Biden received 10M more votes than Harris, but the infographic states that 88M people stayed home. You think only 10M of them were Democrats?

  • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Not voting is a choice.

    Like it or not, this is what America chose. The only thing left to do is work to mitigate the damage and figure how to make more Americans take that choice seriously in the future.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Exactly. 88mil people were, at best, indifferent to a Trump presidency. Considering just how bad Trump is that is inexcusable. Like, imagine looking at that fuckwad and going “meh, I don’t really care either way.”

    • Tarogar@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There is this saying : if you didn’t exercise your right to vote, you don’t have the right to complain about the election results either.

      Not voting is effectively saying : “don’t care, either is good for me.” So… Yes you did choose this result by virtue of not making your opinion heard when you were asked for your opinion.

      • aeischeid@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        Because of the way Electoral College works especially, but many other factors contribute to apathetic non-voting behavior. Potential voters feel their vote literally doesn’t matter and statistically and practically speaking they are not wrong. Dismissing all of that by saying “non-voters also chose this” outcome is naive and shortsighted and is in my mind taking the side of injustice.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          Vote or accept the outcomes. People who had the right to vote and refused to exercise that right are just as responsible for the outcome as everyone else.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      54 minutes ago

      For every left leaning person that protest voted third party or just decided not to bother for some perceived inadequacy in Kamala, real or imagined, congratulations. You played yourself. For every eligible non-voter, wake the fuck up. Harris was not perfect, definitely had some flaws and wishy washy positions. But you know what she was? Fucking normal. There is no policy for which Trump was superior, and there is no norm, tradition, law, or morality that Trump will not challenge, ignore, or destroy. You people need to fucking do something. Participation is the bare minimum. Grow up.

      Update: To all you salty down voters, yes, I mean you. Grow up.

  • rrrurboatlibad@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    Can you make a map comparing 2020 to 2024? Was voter turnout like this last time? Cool map btw. Thank you

  • radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 hours ago

    All that this map shows is how disenfranchised people feel with the electoral college. What’s the point of voting in 43 states when you already know who the winner will be and your vote is effectively meaningless?

    By the way, I voted out of principle, but I do not judge those who feel their votes don’t matter.

  • corroded@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’ll preface this by saying that I strongly feel that in a democratic society, citizens have a patriotic duty to do certain things. Jury duty makes our justice system work. Taxes make our public services work. Voting makes our democracy work.

    I can’t fathom the idea of not voting. Even if you don’t support any particular candidate, you still have the option to pick the person who is less likely to ruin your way of life. I have voted in every election since I’ve been old enough to do so. I’ve voted for a few candidates I really believe in, and I’ve voted against a few I truly hated. I have never voted for a candidate that aligned with my views 100%, but I’ve always voted.

    Given the popular vote numbers, it’s an undeniable fact that the majority of American voters support Trump. Given the lack of turnout, though, I have to wonder if it’s true that the majority of American citizens support Trump. A large group of the population supports the GOP, and a large group of the population just doesn’t give a shit. Both are equally to blame for the next 4 years of suffering.

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but citizens don’t elect the president. This is one of the citizenship questions most naturally born citizens don’t know about.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Here is my off the cuff proposal for what to do after that

    This is about as likely as my off the cuff proposal of flying around the planet faster than the speed of light so it rotates backwards and turns back time

  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    49 minutes ago

    Even with the “broad immunity granted by the SCOTUS”, Biden can’t do what you want him to do. Immunity from prosecution does not mean ability to rewrite election laws.

    Ambassadors are largely immune to prosecution too, do you think they can rerun our election?

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Biden almost certainly won’t do anything like this.

    Biden can’t do this. States have most of the control over how their elections run. For anything like this to be pushed by the Fed it would take a constitutional amendment which requires congress to approve followed by 2/3rds of states to ratify. Stop blaming administrations for not being criminal, it just grants the criminal administrations cover.

    • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      Slight correction: A costitutional amendment requires 2/3 majorities in both houses of congress, and ratification by 3/4 of state legislatures.

    • aeischeid@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      can’t is squishy here. Technically you’re probably right, but you think Turnip would let that stop him? Biden has about as much power as he is willing to fight for, which is pretty little, obviously, but IMO it tilts more “won’t” than “can’t”

      • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        Anything Biden does with a click of his fingers Trump could undo as easily. But that is irrelevant since this would be in violation of the constitution. Even the mega-dangerous “the supreme court said the president is king” argument doesn’t hold up because this breaks one of the 2 guardrails (must be constitutional) in their ruling.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Can we have an empty podium for president?

    Empty Podium 2024!

    Edit: Lol I was too caught up on my Empty Podium joke I forgot to even read your post, but your proposal is funny

    So, what if Biden used broad immunity SCOTUS granted to declare a crisis of democracy

    You know SCOTUS only said presidents and ex-presidents are immune from prosecution?

    It doesn’t give the president any extra power, but just says “You can’t do that, but you don’t get in trouble if you tried.”

    The president still have to find a yes-man in the government to do his bidding.

    Biden doesn’t have any yes-men

    And also SCOTUS can still later delare them “unofficial acts” so if Biden tries and fails to assassinate SCOTUS, he can actually end up in prison.

    • aeischeid@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      being immune from prosecution not being extra power, is for some a distinction without a difference.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        50 minutes ago

        Biden: Hey, it’s the POTUS. Your state needs to repeat the election. Make sure they use RCV, and I want you to tell the police to arrest nonvoters.

        Governor: No.

        Biden: But I’m immune from prosecution

        Governor: Still no.

        Biden: I’ll come down there and kill you with my bare hands!

        Governor: I don’t think so.

        Biden: I’ll send Seal Team Six to do it, and then pardon them!

        Governor: They know you can’t pardon state murder charges.

        Biden: You know immunity isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.

        • aeischeid@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          33 minutes ago

          Since this isn’t some super serious scenario I am trying to iron out all the details on at least use your imagination a little bit. Re-running the whole election? no, and not what I suggested. Re-running the presidential election, one ballot for a federal office, why do the states need to be involved much at all? I mean if we’re doing something drastic like this it isn’t like we would still use the electoral college system.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Big difference.

        That court ruling is more useful for republicans since democratic-leaning officials are less likely to do stuff like assassinating SCOTUS.

        Meanwhile once trump gets into office, he’ll order the military to, say, shoot protestors on sight. Refuse? Fired. Next in line, same orders. Keep firing until you find someone. The military generallt leans right wing. Eventually he’ll find a Magat.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The map is cool, but the thing is everyone is too scared to do anything for fear of Trump’s rabid supporters becoming violent. Its very possible any challenge to these results sets off mass political violence or another Jan 6th. I’d love to do your suggestion but you aren’t ever getting everyone to vote until we have a week or two off to do it specifically.