OK, but be honest about it, your problem is the religion itself.

I have many audio recordings of them not just saying “OK” is the problem

Trust me, I think they did everything they could to be as obnoxious as possible. Do audio record though

CBP is relentless in its mission to safeguard the nation’s borders and the privacy of all citizens. CBP’s biometric facial comparison technology is hosted within a secure cloud-based environment and does not store biographic data for any travelers. CBP retains U.S. citizen photos for no more than 12 hours after identity verification and only for continuity of operations purposes.

https://www.cbp.gov/travel/biometrics/privacy-policy

Is what they claim. What you saw may have been about non-citizens

They store the data from everytime you enter and exit the country. For citizens they claim to delete that data after a couple days- but I would not be too confident in that. So if you are a citizen ALWAYS opt out of biometric entry and exit. I’ve multiple times been told it is not an option, then being forced to wait 10 minutes- harassed about why I want to opt out, then it suddenly becomes an option. This is despite CBPs policy that you cannot be penalized for it. I have several audio recordings of this happening because I noticed how much of a pattern it was.

UK is now also doing the same

That’s how religion works. It tends to inform people’s morality

What the article is about

This I kinda don’t get, in that this is probably the most vanilla thing you’d expect to hear from basically anyone of any religion about their spouse not following it.

Did you see what he said?

Read the rules pls

Thats contrary to the basis of Islam and Christianity, which explicitly have always been about conversions.

Christians believe their God cares about and wants them to try to save everyone, they believe following the Christian God is the path to everlasting happiness, that’s where the evangelism comes from- even when it takes a cruel form it is at least in theory a good intent(in practice of course often not).

Muslims believe their God wants all people to recognize and submit to the truth of himself, and that spreading this message is a duty.

you don’t believe in the Constitution, rule of law, or America.

Which party does?

I see what you’re saying but I think when you really get to know a person you’d be hard pressed to find two that overlap so much that theres nothing they can learn from each other.

No I agree completely, its just less interesting, and less opportunity.

In reality though, whether we mostly agree on most values(other than how they treat me and specific people I care about) does not have much of an impact in how I choose who date.

for example, human rights

The thing is, I think you, I, and basically everyone disagrees on what human rights are. It would be hard to date in much of the world if you believed in freedom of speech, or vice versa in other places.

they have to be able to see humanity in all

Again, I think in many places its hard to find people who do.

I don’t think its constructive for us to be a relationship if they don’t at least have the potential to get there.

I don’t see why someone having the same view of morality as me is necessary to have a relationship.

Second, the stereotyping by politics is so inaccurate as to be insulting.

Isn’t that the whole premise of this post?

I find politics to be very important if not the most important factor in choosing a long term partner.

Noticing trends, I feel like people who say this have limited experience in close relationships with people of widely disparate views. I personally would hate to date someone who agrees with me on most things. Not only because it would be boring, but because it would be hard to learn and grow from them.

People do that with people they dislike too

Oh okay, I misunderstood, I had assumed 2018 was when New York legalized marijuana or something. I didn’t know retroactive denaturalization worked like that. Thank you for helping to inform :)

Why does it have to be before 2018? Isn’t it federally still a controlled substance? Same reason there’s a Supreme Court case on a weed user being stripped of the 2nd Amendment rights.

Tax debt over say $1 million as income