• CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    Serious question, does consuming a virus give a similar viral load as inhaling an equal amount?

    • GentriFriedRice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Assuming you mean viral load referring to mucuses or blood of the infected. Given that the human influenza virus’ entry requires the viral surface proteins (hemagglutinin (HA)) to bind to acids present on respiratory epithelial cells along with cleavage of HA by host cell proteases (enzymes that breakdown proteins) to facilitate membrane fusion. These trypsin-like proteases are mainly expressed in airway tissues, restricting influenza viral tissue response to the respiratory tract. I would say it would be highly unlikely for influenza viral replication existing in an environment lacking this crucial interaction let alone a low-pH environment like the GI tract

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      You don’t swallow all of the milk and thus not all of the virus particles. There’s always some residue that can then start to infect you just as if you inhaled the virus.

  • jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    My milkshake brings all the boys to graveyard

    And they’re like, it’s better than SARS.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    I used to think if these people did the dumb things they would die before having any impact on the rest of us.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Still unlikely to develop human to human transmission this way.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s truly our way.

    Millenia of storytelling: These are things that can happen, let’s make sharing information fun.

    History: Look at all this misery. Look at it.

    Post-covid: Ok boys, we gave it a go. Good job overall, but we need to do better next time. Let’s hit the showers then the replays to see what we can do better.

    Us: Why is this happening? Who did this to me? Because I’ve been kept in the dark I will decide how to handle this new situation and spread the word.

  • MilitantVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Easy to point the finger at everyone doing this, but every person who continues buying and consuming animal products are still most primarily to blame for this situation.

    If this does become a new pandemic, we might be talking about an unprecedented ~50% of the human population killed. A real life Thanos event. Thanks omnivores.

    • enbyecho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I happen to think Militant Vegans should be eaten or composted but even I will agree that your first sentence is broadly correct. Industrialized agriculture and CAFO operations are to blame for this so you can generally say that consuming animal products is to blame.

      Your second point is highly speculative and not based on any factual evidence. The speculated worst case scenario seems to be maybe 20x COVID-19, or 140 million worldwide.

      As a vegan, I should think you’d celebrate even that high rate of attrition. It would mean, overall, far fewer delicious animals being consumed.

  • fl42v@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, it may give 'em immunity. Just not how they think it should (although I’m not sure if they can think at all) :D