moonbunny@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 26 days agoRule the spectrumlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1470file-text
arrow-up1470imageRule the spectrumlemmy.blahaj.zonemoonbunny@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 26 days agomessage-square29linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·26 days agoyou can also get the “good at science, bad at math” kind. which is worse.
minus-squareSasha [They/Them]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·24 days agoYou can also be the “good at maths, bad at maths” kind
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 days agogood at seeing patterns in math, dyscalculic
you can also get the “good at science, bad at math” kind. which is worse.
Same here. It sucks.
You can also be the “good at maths, bad at maths” kind
good at seeing patterns in math, dyscalculic