• tal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, if you have USB, for a non-mobile platform, it doesn’t really matter. It’s not hard to get a USB audio interface.

      For cell phones or laptops, I can understand not wanting another thing to plug in, but for something like a Raspberry Pi…shrugs

          • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            USB audio will always be better in pricing options, but the question is, which will give you better sound for the price. Of course, this only matters if you think audio quality is more important than price.

            • tal@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Why would you expect USB to constrain your audio quality?

              You’re not getting better 0s or 1s based on which bus they’re sent over to the DAC.

              • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Please re-read my response. I never said that USB would always constrain the audio quality, but if you get a cheap USB to aux converter, the quality would be lacking vs a more expensive solution.

                • fkn@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You are making just such a weird argument and it sounds like you are retroactively trying to salvage a bad position because you made a mistake.

                  1. If you care strongly about audio quality. A built-in doesn’t have any quality guarantees… why then does usb vs hat matter?

                  2. If quality is your concern why bring up price in the first part? It is blatantly obvious that cheap parts *might" equate to cheap quality. This is blatantly obvious.

                  3. Obviously there will be USB solutions that are equal or better solutions than prebuilt rpi dac hats since the primary dac hats are exceptionally niche.

                  This response just sounds like you got caught out in your mistake/bad argument. Why be a dick about it?

    • StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, the pi’s have always been famous for low quality sound cards, so there’s plenty of hats that can add the functionality.

    • amio@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I generally hate the “just get dongles lol” argument but… maybe it’s not a huge loss in this one specific case. I’ve had four models over 3 generations (B, 2-something and 3) and the audio jack always kinda… sucked.

        • passepartout@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I remember when i wanted to make something like a chromecast audio with volumio and spotify connect on my Pi 2. I had to buy an audio DAC (~30€) because I could not get the 3.5 Jack to work correctly. It just sounded bad when cranked up to a volume you could actually hear something. You almost couldn’t understand lyrics in songs due to the static noise. I read that this was due to being badly shielded from the power source.

          The Audio jack on the Pi 3 I have is ok, but still not that good compared to the Audio DAC of course. But then again, the audio DAC i bought for 30€ was said to be on par with 1000€ standalone audio interfaces lol.

        • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was some hacked-together sound output that was terrible quality compared to a real sound card output, AFAIK. You could make it make sounds, but if you care at all about quality it was a non-starter, which is one reason a whole lot of audio hats exist.

        • amio@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Connectors seemed low quality and so did the audio. Crackling and sounding… sort of like a broken toy for kids.

    • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a shame that even the Pi Foundation is cutting corners. Cutting corners and removing features all while not even coming close to their target $35 price. Almost double for the base model. This doesn’t feel like it fits the spirit of the original Pi Foundation goals at all.

  • ohto@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want to be excited about this, but I just don’t believe I’ll actually be able to get one for retail price. For much of the RP4 lifecycle they prioritized corporate sales, and regular consumers were out of luck. I don’t have a lot of faith in them right now.

    • tal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      we’re going to ringfence all of the Raspberry Pi 5s we sell until at least the end of the year for single-unit sales to individuals, so you get the first bite of the cherry.

      • EmilieEvans@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        To keep alive the community that maintains the packages that businesses use? /s

        There are a few things you won’t forget and the last years were one of those events. Thankfully the competition made leaps forward regarding software support.

        Do you remember FTDI-gate 1 & 2 (approx. 1 decade ago)? I do and FTDI never made it back onto my BOM and probably never will again, at least until SiliconLabs, WCH, and Holtek screw it up.

        • flatpandisk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We are dumping the RPI computer modules form our BOM too. The N100 is at a very low price point and readily available. Never again in my BOM.

    • Tak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s gotten to the point with Windows 11 killing so many thin clients for businesses with TPM that you can typically find used ones for nearly as much as a Pi. Unless you need the size and efficiency I just struggle to find reason to buy another Pi if I need to selfhost something.

      Pis are really cool but they really have become more corporate focused and it shows.

  • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Pi foundation screwed over its original customer base by diverting practically ALL available inventory to business customers. Good riddance.

    • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Once they hired that former cop who bragged about using these RPI’s for “legal” surveillance police operations, I was done with them. This goes completely against the DIY spirit. There are so many better options out there without cops and without snarky Twitter social media managers.

    • somedaysoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Remember when they said the Rpi3 had 1Gbps speeds. That’s when they started to lose me. Pine64 has had a far better competing board going back to the Rpi3, and they don’t use scummy marketing practices like the Pi Foundation.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, Pine64 is absolutely an organization that adheres to their stated ethos. They are what the Pi foundation should have been, but only pretends to be.

        • themoken@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I dunno about ethos, but I do know Pine can also make false claims. I bought a Rock64 years back and they touted it as 4k60 video capable with an integrated GPU and that wasn’t realistic at all. The software stack was still very immature on release. From their own wiki, years later, it still doesn’t work and key parts still haven’t been upstreamed.

      • cole@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Libre computer is pretty good too. I’m a big fan of the Libre computer renegade

      • a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sort of. I still haven’t been able to snag the top of the line CM4 (WiFi, 8gig ram, 32 gig emmc). I’ve seen a handful of CM4s with different configs that I don’t want. But for the 4B, yeah they can be bought now.

        Edit: haven’t been able to snag one in my region*

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’d like to thank you: we’re going to ringfence all of the Raspberry Pi 5s we sell until at least the end of the year for single-unit sales to individuals, so you get the first bite of the cherry.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh come now, it’s the principle of the thing.

      But indeed I doubt I’ll be able to buy one for a long time.

      • Schmuppes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty glad I got myself a Pi 4 for the normal price when it was relatively fresh on the market. I’m tempted to try and get a Pi 5 to replace it and use the Pi 4 for something else at some point. I’m not sure what that might be though, and I feel like the expected scarcity is what even makes me consider it at all. I use my Pi 4 for Kodi on my trusty dumb TV and have recently put my old 3B+ to use for my 3D printer. I’m now left with no spare Pi for whatever might arise.

        • DokPsy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Might as well add some picos to scratch that itch. And the rabbit hole that micro controllers bring… next thing you know, your work desk is also a solder station, a hot air station, PCB design, circuit design, and you’ve got two extra diy printers in various state of being built/rebuilt

          I don’t have a problem, you have a problem

          • CobolSailor@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I started out the same way and now my desk is cluttered with partially completed projects and devices in various states of taken apart. But for me the fun part is learning something new along the project journey. The microcontrollers were a game changer due to their low cost. I’m not trying to fry them, but hey if I screw up who cares it was a couple bucks anyways.

            For circuits I design I’ve mostly been having them created overseas and I’ll solder on the components but I’m really curious about hacking a toaster into a refry oven or whatever their called and soldering surface mount components. Not that I need the small form factor or I’m making enough circuits to warrant trying to save on cost, I’m just curious and want to try haha. Gonna need a bigger desk…

            • DokPsy@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Honestly, get the flux and a hot air station instead, imo. Then again, I prefer being able to have control over where the heat is going instead of reflowing everything at once

    • toikpi@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have pre-ordered one for delivery in October. If you look at https://rpilocator.com/ you will find various models in stock at the official price. The Raspberry Pi clearly isn’t the tool for you

  • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its not very price competitive now. Its moved into the low end N100 territory with ITX boards and while its smaller and a bit less power its no where near as performant. They will still have some use in smaller applications but 5V x 5A is a chunky cable. I am not convinced this is the way now.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      My main uses for them weren’t ever desktop but tinkering with simple robotics / telepresence, automation, aprs / mapping, 3d printing (octoprint). Seems like the 5 is overkill for that. I guess there’s always the pi zero.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Haven’t read the article but is it seriously 5V 5A for the power cable? It seems absurd that they wouldn’t put a voltage regulator on board to accept a 12V 2A power supply.

      • Nath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The idea is they run off USB. Having said that, I’m pretty sure most of us just plug it into mains power.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even still I wonder if they could have added USB-PD capabilities in order to use 9V or 15V to bring the current down. A 5V 5A USB supply is very unique (even the previous 5V 3A was niche) as standard USB supplies that we’re all used to typically max out at 2.5A. $12 for the official power supply is a decent price but you’re severely limited on options if you don’t have the official supply.

          • cryptowillem@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Looking at the power supply listing, it says that it is USB-PD. It lists output as “5A @ 5.1V, 3A @ 9V, 2.25A @ 12V, 1.8A @ 15V”.

            I fully admit that I don’t understand USB-PD, though. Does the Pi have to support it too?

            • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, USB-PD requires a handshake confirming that both the charger and device are capable of using it.

              I didn’t look any further than the article listing the power supply as 5V5A so its good that it supports higher voltages, but really odd that it’d push out 25W at 5V as this is very demanding on the wiring since it has internal resistance which causes the voltage to drop with increasing length. The whole purpose of USB-PD is to up the voltage while reducing current to mitigate losses (and heat and wire thickness) and supply much higher wattage without having to use chunky wiring. This has been an issue with the Pi for quite a while which is why you always hear troubleshooting responses talking about having too small of a power supply. Now they’ve upped the power requirements while still using a 5V baseline. I did see the article mention that it has a voltage regulator capable of handling 20A of current so maybe it’s just poorly worded with regards to the official power supply.

      • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s pretty hefty… and there’s an official cooling solution to remove all that heat too…

        They’re basically going for the low end desktop market with it I think.

  • droidpenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I love Raspberry Pis and have a few older ones, it’s a shame that the latest ones were very hard to come by and far exceeded the $35 price point.

    I was looking to upgrade to a Pi 4 a while back but prices were outrageous or it was sold out completely. I eventually discovered tiny form factor PCs.

    I bought some used Lenovo Tiny ThinkCentres (which are about 10x more powerful than a Pi 4), off eBay for ~ $70. I upgraded the Ram and SSDs and they are quite capable, low power units!

    So to anyone looking for a low power computer to run Linux, consider buying used off eBay. You can get some pretty good deals on used hardware that’s more capable.

    • Schmuppes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A friend of my dad’s old PC recently shit the bed and recommended such a ThinkCenter purely by specs and price point. I did some remote setup last night and I got the impression that it was pretty snappy running Windows 10. Such a tiny computer is definitely on my list for the future.

      • droidpenguin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That would be more than capable. Retro emulation can run on very low end hardware.

        But here’s an ebay listing for same model that I bought earlier. It doesn’t include an SSD but you can buy M.2 SSDs for very cheap which I also did. Plus they’re much faster and more reliable than micro SD cards.

        It’s very easy to open the machine up which I liked.

        RAM upgrades are cheap too but 8GB is a lot for most cases.

        A lot of corporate environments use these so when they upgrade you can find them used for dirt cheap, if you don’t mind some possible cosmetic defects. Mine are just stacked on a shelf and I just use them as servers for docker and whatnot.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you need something with power sure! RasPi has a huge community that supports it, that’s what sets it apart.

  • Polar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Realistically probably not getting one for less than $160CAD.

    At that point, might as well just buy a used Dell optiplex or something. These boards are absurdly priced, and you’ll never get it for MSRP.

    Even with the added power consumption of the Dell you’ll pull out ahead lol

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember when the Raspberry Pi was the amazing $15 computer. Times have changed.

      • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Amazing for what exactly? I remember them being unreliable, slow af and not really good for much other than collecting dust.

        I mean sure the idea was cool, in principle, but they needed a serious upgrade in specs. Now they got it and everyone bitches bc it comes at a price?

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago
          • Kiosks – my makerspace uses one for guest signin
          • Pihole – make your life less ad-infested without browser plugins
          • Octoprint – run your 3d printers
          • Home voice assistant without relying on a big company of any kind, or sending them sounds of you having sex

          The first models were rough on reliability, but they got a lot better around Model 2B and onward. SD cards with A1 or A2 rating help a lot.

          • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t need any of those things tho. Mostly what I need is decent IO throughput which was unnecessarily constrained on earlier pis by poor design choices. The pi4 is the first to really shine in that regard.

            I have a pi2 and I used it as a libreelec media center, and it was Ok in that capacity, but it’s far too slow to transfer larger files regardless of how you do it (all relies on a slow usb interface).

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Priced at $60 for the 4GB variant, and $80 for its 8GB sibling (plus your local taxes), virtually every aspect of the platform has been upgraded, delivering a no-compromises user experience.

    Ehhhhhh, that’s pushing it. Didn’t the v4 and v3 cost in the $30-$40 range?

    • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, they didn’t even try to come close to the $35 price point. That was always RPi’s big selling point. I know COVID screwed that up but I was hoping it was a temporary thing, instead it seems they’ve used it as an excuse to raise prices permanently. Really stifles any excitement I had for the Pi 5 as RPi’s biggest advantage over the competition has traditionally been their low entry price. The base model is almost double the $35 point and we all know it’s getting scalped. Good luck getting a Pi 5 for a reasonable price.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I assume this will be prohibitively expensive (I really can’t shell out any more than £60 and that’s pushing it already), and probably impossible to get my hands on.

    But if it’s affordable and actually available? Hell yeah, this thing looks fantastic. I love that we’re making something awesome here in the UK and sharing it with the world.

    Will we finally be able to run N64 games on this hardware, do you think?

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      N64 could be done before with overclocking by the looks of it, so this should handle it as a baseline.

      Although nothing really gets you over the “our games are in 3D and we don’t really know what we’re doing” jank of the PS1 and N64 era.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering single core performance was the main thing holding it back previously. There is a good chance Nintendo 64 emulation should be better. Other Arm based SBC have been able to do it relatively easily for a while.

  • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    These things are great for [email protected] often time leagues more efficient per watt in terms of computation than regular PCs. I have a couple of 'em working on cancer research and computing to develop an open-source patent-free covid antiviral. You don’t need a PhD to make a difference, all you need is a processor :)

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they were more efficient per watt for scientific computing, you’d hear about researchers building HPC clusters from them.

      • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If they were more efficient per watt for scientific computing, you’d hear about researchers building HPC clusters from them.

        Efficiency per watt is not the same as total cost of ownership. Pis are expensive for the amount of compute you get from them in total, but the compute itself is efficient per watt. You would need at least a dozen Pis to rival the latest CPU processors in terms of total output, a dozen Pis is more expensive to buy than a single CPU.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did a quick Google.
      https://web.eece.maine.edu/~vweaver/group/green_machines.html

      Is the best actual test data I can find. It uses a physical power meter, so it’s full system (not TDP or self reporting power consumption).
      And it’s a few years out of date.
      Seems like Apple silicon is the winner (and will probably continue to be).
      The Xeon that beats the rpi4 for GFLOPS/watt is an e5v3, which was launched in 2013 and EOL in 2021.
      So there will absolutely be some new Xeon CPUs that will perform better.

      However, for a $50 device, it’s probably the best GFLOPS/watt/$ from what little empirical data I can find