• Myxomatosis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    232
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “The bad guys won in WWII. There were no ‘good guys’ in that war. The controlling interests had a jump ball. If you look closely, you see the link between liberalism and communism in the Allied forces.”

    Just another demented MAGA turd trying to sound intelligent. All the buzzwords are there to keep the base frothing at the mouth: liberal, controlling interest/deep state, bad, communism.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      “both sides” too

      E.g.:

      Being genocidal racist fascists

      Or…

      Wanting affordable healthcare for all Americans and therefore being “communist”

      How does one choose between such evils?

      • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s a fucking Nazi coward afraid to speak their true feelings. They say both sides, pretending they feel both were bad, but you can see their real opinion.

    • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you look closely

      Holy fuck that is funny. As though an analysis of factual information were even in the realm of speculative potential for the republican brain.

      He’s clever. It’s a great joke.

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        perhaps it takes them great mental investiture to see the link between the soviet union and communism

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          I know I struggle to see the link between the Soviet Union and communism, but I suppose that’s what I get for getting my definitions of words from the dictionary.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        he thought the nazi’s were the good guys

        Quote him: “There were no ‘good guys’ in that war.”

        It isn’t enough to criticize him for not considering the Allies the good guys, but you just have to go that one step further and claim that he believes something that is directly contradicted by what he wrote?

        It’s like people are afraid of encountering someone who is less than 100% wrong/bad/evil, and refuse to believe there is anyone between ‘saint’ and ‘demon’. Must be exhausting living with such a starkly binary outlook.

        • mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Sounds like you are describing a video game. The whole “if they say X it means X because those are the rules of the language.” I mean.

          • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            Or… he said “there were no good guys”, so claiming that he’s saying Nazis were the good guys is really, really stupid.

            “I think all vegetables are disgusting.”
            “He’s saying celery is delicious, guys.”

            Dopes.

            • mhague@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              27 days ago

              On paper it sounds funny, doesn’t it? How can a guy randomly saying everyone was bad in WW2 mean he secretly thinks Nazis were alright?

              Easiest way to get at the logic is to dissect people who say “both sides are the same.” How can that mean they’re actually pro MAGA or whatever? Didn’t they just say that both sides are the same? That’s against the rules of English! But it makes sense if you dig deeper.

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good old GOP, still sending their best.

    In one specific interaction from Monday, White told a potential voter to “pull their skirt down” and that “nobody cares about your preferences,” to which the voter replied “f— you then! You just lost my families support.”

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Oh yeah, Hitler loved mixed race citizens 😆🤣👍

    This dude’s relatives would have been gassed and cremated or introduced into a life of indentured servitude had his revisionist fantasy come to fruition.

    Dude thinks because his last name is “White” that he is white.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is this the same guy who flipped out about the word “weird” with tons of posts about trans people like a demented moron? Looks similar.

  • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is there some sort of training which teaches you how to be a grifter?

    Because this 2024 class is full of people imitating Uncle Ruckuses.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sure, there are no good guys in any war, since the good guys are never the ones with guns killing each other.

    But the more genocidal death camps you have, the bigger a baddy you are. It’s not that difficult to understand.

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m Jewish, I’m very aware that the side running brutal racist internment camps was meaningfully less bad than the side running brutal genocidal death camps. Neither qualify as good.

        • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The Axis existed as a coalition of countries who wanted to expand their lands at the cost of their neighbor’s lives.

          The Allies existed purely as a defensive response to the Axis.

          A person with a gun fighting to defend their families is not “just as evil” as a person with a gun invading the home of others. Before we even get into camps, unethical medical research, and genocide, you really can’t “both sides” this one.

          • Hegar@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            I don’t think it’s fair to characterize global colonialist powers like Britain, France, or the US as not violent expansionists.

            • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Don’t put words in my mouth.

              I characterized the Allies actions as a defensive response. And they provably were not violently expanding during WW2. I didn’t say a word about their actions and behaviors prior to WW2.

              The fuck do you suggest “good people” do facing invasion? Lay down and let the Axis steal, rape, murder, and genocide their way through Europe?

              Good people fight back against bad people. Saying or doing anything less is to be complicit in their actions.

              • Hegar@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Apologies.

                But if being a violent expansionist makes the axis bad (which it obviously does) then the allies are clearly just less bad in this particular situation rather than actually good, since all the allied powers have extensive histories of violent expansionism.

                • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Thank you.

                  I’m not saying you don’t have a point, but the people are not their countries, their ancestors choices, or their governments, and vice versa. I fundamentally reject the premise of your argument.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Inaction is as much a choice as action. When an invader comes to your town and starts killing innocents like children, and you chose to not act, you’re a little bit complicit.

      Pacifists are just as unethical as the rest, because it allows, permits and other condones violence.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    we need a time machine if for no other reason than to send dumbasses like that back to experience reality for themselves

  • xploit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    To a degree yeah, bunch of them made it to US and went unpunished and now spew this shit.
    (edit: or obviously whoever heard them and thought “Hmm yes yes genocide and stuff great ideas dad/grandad/friend/whatever.” Probably can’t even specify if it’s the Nazis or Russians since they would have rather worked together, until the backstab…

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      they would have rather worked together

      The USSR spent the 30s trying to form an alliance with literally everyone in Europe to fight the guys who declared communism their enemy. The western allies expected Germany and Poland to invade the USSR, for them fascism was the answer to communism, hence why they gave the Sudetenland to Germany and Poland, made the Anglo-German declaration of 1938, and why Britain tried to join the Winter War, but was only stopped by Sweden refusing transit.

      The USSR wasn’t trying to work with Germany, they were taking the only path that would give them time to build up and draw the rest of Europe into its war with Germany.