deleted by creator

Then you should find someone in a swing state to vote swap with to get Harris a vote where it matters and keep Trump out.

First off, doesn’t matter what the polls say, go vote. Second, this is a very interesting poll. In 2016 this was one of the few polls that predicted Trump would win IA. It also predicted he would win IA in 2020 too, which he did. That this poll is calling for Harris to do well this year lets me feel just a little bit of hope.

Just to reiterate, VOTE.

Summary: Trump blows, sometimes literally.

These are not hints. He means what he says. The lunatic flat out said he’s going to put RFK, a rabid anti-vaxxer, in charge of the FDA.

“I’m going to let him [RFK] go wild on health. I’m going to let him go wild on food. I’m going to let him go wild on medicine.”

No. They use the same image for the banner in the article. It’s a red hat but not a Trump hat.

Republican National Committee spokesperson Anna Kelly, speaking on behalf of the Trump campaign, did not directly respond to the Whitewater officials’ repudiation of Trump’s claims, but said “Local officials in communities across the country have sounded the alarm about problems caused by Kamala Harris’ open border.”

Please provide the names of the local officials and list the evidence they provided to support their claims. I’m sure such a request would be met with silence, but even if this Anna Kelly person did provide the names of some MAGA zealots who would make these claims, I am quite certain that any evidence they provided would be of the sort Trump’s people have provided to support his claim that he won in 2020, that is to say, non-existent.

At the time, Carlson says, he was asleep in bed with his wife – and four dogs.

I have an alternate theory about those claw marks…

Doesn’t matter. Don’t let them make you complacent. Go vote!

It’s not even taken out of context. He literally said, “I said, well, I’m going to do it whether the women like it or not. I am going to protect them.”

the Supreme Court didn’t explain the reason for the decision

What could they say, though? “We know you’re breaking federal law and all that but carry on. Those votes won’t suppress themselves.”

He says the fact that the court got involved on a case like this at the last minute means they don’t plan to be sitting on the sidelines. It shows they’re willing to be involved in some of the minutia of running an election. And we know a lot of litigation is headed their way this election season.

I have long been saying that the plan is for SCOTUS to step in and declare the winner after Trump and his agents sew enough chaos, so it’s frankly terrifying to hear this comment from an election law expert. I’ve really been hoping I am wrong.

Only a little intentional :) . It was the best I could find quickly.

As someone who has worked for many years in customer service and retail environments, I can conclude from your post that you haven’t worked directly with the public very much.

And nearly triple what it was on September 23rd.

These are in articles for the general public. Assuming even a general understanding of graphing is not reasonable in this case.

Considering the apparently unbreakable rule that every conservative accusation is really a confession, does this mean Musk voted when he was still an illegal immigrant in the USA?

Trump in a garbage truck? Right where he belongs, well almost. He should be in the back. How did his handlers miss the symbolism here?

Yep. Sounds like jury nullification for Trump supporters if you get tried in the right place.