• kralk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Pro tip, if this happens to you split your tickets up into smaller chunks! It has two effects:

    One is that you will see progress from one sprint to the next, even if it’s 1 story point at a time.

    It also has a psychological effect! If you’re like me you will avoid the huge, nebulous tasks. But if it’s something manageable with a defined start and end, you will do it. You could probably even schedule it.

    • Picard@nrw.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      @urquell @yogthos
      then it ain’t correct scrum. the team should decide to add more people.

      but you know scrum is like teenage sex… everybody says he does it only a small percentage do and a insignificant number do it right

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        If there is so few people that get it right, maybe the problem is that the system is not adapted for the vast majority of people and the reality of the work life, and other options should be explored.

        But there is always someone claiming that everyone else get it wrong and blablabla.

        But someone with a MBA in a closed office is pushing that shit all the time, and everyone that has to use it roll their eyes because they know damn well that the only thing that will matter is those damn story points, and the people will game the system because that’s all that matters to those that don’t use the system, and you will hear about that other team that always finish the tasks in their sprint.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m starting to think the way to go isn’t set stories in the sprint at all. There’s a refined backlog in priority order. You grab one, do it, grab the next. At the end of the two week period, you can still have a retro to see how the team is doing, but don’t worry about rollover.

    Alternatively, don’t think of Agile as a set instruction manual, but rather a group of suggestions. Have problem X? Solution Y worked for many teams, so try that.

  • Naz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ancient developer here / not really a coder, but what the hell is “Agile” software development?

    Is it some kind of pseudonym for pushing buggy, untested code to a production server or something?

    Like a speed run category for software development?