Edit: Replaced “Restrictions” in place of the word “Ban”

  • tenchiken@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 month ago

    Chaos and rebellion.

    Sell off any phones that I can’t modify. Aggressively de-Google while setting up fake accounts to send garbage into their system training.

    Light my way with the burning of bridges.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      google saw that EU allowed apple to do something similar, so why not take the chance to lock the garden…

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah they wont.

      Sure, they are really good on the right-to-repair issue, but that’s because they want to be more independent and less reliant on other countries to make new phones. As for privacy and information control, the government don’t really have an incentive to give people more privacy and freedoms. They are still trying to pass chat control with a majority of the EU members in support (the only reason its not passed yet is because EU laws need to be unanimous)

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You obviously don’t understand EU, it’s far from only right to repair, but EU has many protections against American shenanigans, like tracking and storing of personal data, and right to be forgotten (GDPR). EU Also dictated Apple should allow sideloading, something Apple of course mostly circumvented, but they could face steep fines for that too.
        EU also has way stricter regulation than USA and UK on mass surveillance. And generally way better consumer protection than USA.

        • iii@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          EU also mandates de-anonymisation online: (1). EU also plans to have every single message one sends to be scanned by them.

          I think the reasoning behind their decisions is simply summed up as: more power to the EU administration, less freedom for everyone else, be it US tech giants, EU citizens or small software developers.

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 month ago

    For the immediate future, I’ll be all set with GrapheneOS.

    Beyond that, I’ll suffer whatever inconveniences I need to in order to avoid this bullshit. If that means I can’t use my banking apps, I’ll find a better bank, or use the web site, or just say “fuck it all” and stop banking on my phone altogether. I’ve already given up NFC payments. It’s not the end of the world.

    This will only become a bigger pain in the ass as time goes on, I’m sure, but I will die on this hill. I suggest that everyone draw their lines in the sand sooner rather than later.

    • hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      this pain in the ass seems to be cyclic with regards to open source things. over the last 30 odd years of my being in the flow of doing my own thing with my own hardware, it seems like we hit peaks and valleys of “company does something frustrating” -> “community sorts it out”. rinse and repeat.

      it’ll be bumpy but someone will figure it out and we’ll start the cycle again.

      • girthero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I hope so. There is some apps that I’ve simply grown accustomed to using on a phone and I know will not be supported on a Linux phone

    • Broken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep. Me too. I’ll be OK for now with GrapheneOS, and as time goes on I’ll make changes as needed. I’m actually optimistic things will work out before it gets to that point, but if it doesn’t I’m willing to do what I need to. I will die on the hill with you.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m so tired of this shit man, I no longer have any real plan.
    I’m seriously considering carrying the smallest x86/ARM Tablet capable of running Linux I can alongside some cheap phone for 4G hotspot and calls/strictly necessary.

    Guess PC land is the last place we still have freedom (for now!!! 🙄🙄🙄)

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m not one to bang on about the year of Linux, but honestly, the floor is falling out from under ‘consumer Windows,’ and they are doing little to stop it.

        At some point, even OEMs are going to get fed up and start offering their own wine/proton centric distros on some laptops/big tablets. They will be awful and bloated, and business laptops will probably be stuck with Windows forever, but still.

    • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      If my job didn’t require MS Authenticator I would just be carrying around a dumb phone and my work laptop.

      • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        My job requires MS Authenticator and I just use Aegis to make my TOTPs.

        Is there a deeper MS Auth feature that locks you in?

        • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, they don’t allow us to use TOTPs. It’s “passkeys only” through MS Authenticator. Using anything else causes the 365 dashboard to refuse to onboard.

  • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The ban is only in Brazil, Singapore, Thailand and Indonesia. Terrible, and those are some of the bigger markets, but I am not affected in a years time. I will have to see more as we approach the date on working around it.

    • Areldyb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 month ago

      The change is global, but it’s hitting those countries first (2026).

      From the official post about the change:

      • October 2025: Early access begins. Invitations will be sent out gradually.
      • March 2026: Verification opens for all developers.
      • September 2026: These requirements go into effect in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. At this point, any app installed on a certified Android device in these regions must be registered by a verified developer.
      • 2027 and beyond: We will continue to roll out these requirements globally.
      • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I think it was clear I know about it, because I said “in a year’s time”. I even already sent this exact timeline in this thread

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      What’s their PR flavour text for that?

      And how does a company get the authority to do a “ban”? Isn’t that supposed to be a Government thing?

      Seems like their real goal is to make the users of their devices as vulnerable as possible. How?

      • First they remove the ability for other apps to record phone conversations, so we can’t use call recorder apps
      • Then, in the recording feature of their own app, they don’t record the part where it says, “This call is being recorded”, making it possible for anyone to claim that they had not been informed of the call being recorded.
      • While the phone goes screen-off and lock in 15 seconds (that’s the timer I set) when doing something useful, like reading stuff on a website, if I leave it on the home screen, it seems to randomly decide sometimes that it doesn’t want to turn off (last I checked, I waited for > 2minutes before I pressed the off button myself)
        • and then using the off button too much, will make it go bad faster, which will then not have a replacement.
        • they will definitely call this a “bug” if the matter falls out of their hand. But until then, they will keep on denying it. Do they even read bug reports?
      • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        This comment is very conspiratorial. While this change is making people more vulnerable to malware and lessening their freedom, the screen lock thing is complete nonsense. Your launcher has been given permission to keep the screen on. If it is the system launcher and that permission was provided automatically, all you need to do is use another launcher.

        The official Google blogpost states this timeline:

        • October 2025: Early access begins. Invitations will be sent out gradually.

        • March 2026: Verification opens for all developers.

        • September 2026: These requirements go into effect in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. At this point, any app installed on a certified Android device in these regions must be registered by a verified developer.

        • 2027 and beyond: We will continue to roll out these requirements globally.

        There is no PR stunt here, just the need to read. Unless you are considering a PR stunt the claim that it is 50 times more likely to get malware from outside of the Play Store, that is just a complete lie as the Play Store is filled to the brim with malware.

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          If it is the system launcher and that permission was provided automatically, all you need to do is use another launcher.

          I am using stock android on a smartphone that was in the Android One program. I have not changed the the launcher.
          My expectation when keeping the Google first party screen lock thing is for it to not make it easier for me to make the mistake of leaving the phone unlocked.

          At this point, any app installed on a certified Android device in these regions must be registered by a verified developer.

          And that will mean that if I were to feel like making my own app for the smallest of things and just install it on my own phone, I need to tell Google: “Hey! I am programming for Android!” as if they don’t already have enough of my data.
          And then sideloading would probably require signing it with a certificate, so Google will always know that I made a software and installed it on my phone.

          There is no PR stunt here

          Yes. There is no PR “stunt” here. Not everything that includes PR is a stunt.

          Using the phrase “PR flavour text” refers to whatever PR is saying to make the actions of a company, seem less controversial. And that is the main job of a company’s PR department.
          In this case, it is:
          ‘This change aims to reduce malware and scams associated with unverified apps, as sideloaded apps are significantly more likely to contain malicious software’

          And yes, that thing is a lie as you already explained. That is why I call it PR flavour text.


          2027 and beyond: We will continue to roll out these requirements globally.

          This just gives me a deadline for switching to a Linux phone.
          Seems to have come earlier than what I thought I would be able to manage, but I will have to manage somehow.

  • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    Honestly no idea. It’s hard enough finding a phone with an audio jack, and now I have to find a phone with an audio jack, and an unlockable bootloader so I can install another OS?

    Just seems like my way of living is incompatible with modern society. It’s all just too hard

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just seems like my way of living is incompatible with modern society. It’s all just too hard

      I know right?
      Used a locked phone! Submit your ID to the web! Create a Instagram account! SUBMIT! SUBMIT! SUBMIT!

      • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Idk if you’re aware of this. But phones with headphones jacks still have Bluetooth. I use wireless earphones occasionally (and yes, it is horrible) but I also need to be able to plug in to my home hi-fi system

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago
    1. I’ll believe it when I see it.
    2. I’ll begin transitioning to a different linux-based os
  • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    There hasn’t been anything Google on my phone for a while now, so I’ll first wait and see how they regain control over my phone :D

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Trying to import a Pixel 10 from outside of the states for the Sim slot.

    Then GrapheneOS and run it into the ground.

    I really hope Graphene partners with Fairphone, helps them get their security up to par, and make the Fairphone the official Graphene phone.

    Then I could just use Fairphone forever.

  • Ghoelian@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    We’ll have to see how they implement it first. If it’s just through Play Protect, I’m fine as I’m already not using that. If not, guess I’ll have to make-do with a Linux phone.

  • ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    So how long until celluar providers also say you have to have a trusted device to activate your SIM? Apple, Google, Samsung, automotive and Windows would be fine and they’d probably allow their branded or limited hotspots.

    This would basically eliminate any Linux option (pc or phone), and DIY devices. I could see other OOB vendors getting on board to be certified to have a certificate issued to them.

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not impossible, but SIMs go in all kinds of devices nowadays including tons of generic IOT gadgets.

  • obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m going to wait for someone else to figure out a workaround and write a tutorial. Then wait for some indian youtuber to make a video tutorial out of that.

      • Horsey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Dude, why do half the Indian YouTubers sound like mumble rappers. Hell, they’re better than me because they probably speak 3+ languages, but they can’t think it’s good for their viewership.