Welp…

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s Musk so he’ll probably rebrand them as NaXis.

      Maybe enough MAGAts will join him that it will split the vote and it will get easier to get people with basic human decency elected. That is assuming we continue to have elections.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      The only good thing of that is that the otherwise shitty FPTP system will make him and Trump go for each others throat.

    • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Bro as a lefty I’m so scared of this America Party bro. Like we really won’t be able to beat them frfr. If republicans have the Trump Party and the America Party it’ll be like they’re twice as strong. They definitely won’t just start taking sides and splitting the vote so that their already fake “majority” completely falls apart. And the muskrat definitely wouldn’t be dumb enough to try to rig an election so his puppet candidate beats a Trump Party candidate prompting Dump or SCOTUS to crack down on election rigging. That would never in a million years happen bc the America Party is gonna totally be the people’s party bro

      /s just in case

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    I just want to remind anyone thinking that this is a good thing because it will siphon off voters from the Republican Party - Elon Musk is only doing this because Trump cut the EV mandate from the Big Bullshit Bill and didn’t appoint his guy to NASA. No matter what he says about spending or debt ceilings, he doesn’t care about any of it and was in the loop the entire time that legislation was being crafted. He’s still only in this for himself, just as he was when he gleefully threw a Nazi salute on stage thinking he just got everything he could ever want when he bought the president his office.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sure, that’s fine, I just don’t want people to lose sight of the bigger picture here. Musk is not an altruist. He’s not the good guy all of a sudden. He didn’t grow a conscience after falling out with Trump.

        If this political party ever gets off the ground, which it probably won’t, Musk will always have a controlling interest in it. He will never ever let the party move away from enabling and enacting his agenda, and his alone. He doesn’t give a single shit or a wipe about helping Americans. He wants to protect his fortune by taking control of the government apparatus to end regulations or investigations that impede the companies he is in charge of. That’s it.

        I certainly hope that Democrats will see this for the nakedly transparent political maneuver that it is, and not get swept up in the idea of a 3rd party founded and controlled by a billionaire will bring any kind of meaningful change to the system. And I believe they will - we rejected Bloomberg and Steyer in 2020 because they were out-of-touch billionaires who tried to buy their way into the party, and I think that Democrats are not so easily fooled by the obvious bad faith rich cunts who try to buy their way into the public zeitgeist. I just worry that people will see this move by Musk as “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” and shift closer to his values as a result. He might be the enemy of your enemy, but he’s still an an enemy as far as I’m concerned.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          Nobody who actually cares about others thinks Musk is the good guy. This is strictly an evil vs. evil situation.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          This isn’t what anyone is celebrating.

          They don’t think for a second that Musk will do anything positive.

          What they’re hoping for is republicans to split somewhere near the middle, some in support of MAGAts and some in support of Musk, which could lead to more people voting for a democrat than a republican. Votes that would have gone toward a MAGAt will go to Musk. That is the prayer.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      As much as I fucking hate Musk, he does understand two things:

      1. EVs will never be the mainstream without federal and state project support
      2. Funneling money from the government to billionaires is the worst thing for an economy

      What I find fucking mind-blowing is that this idiot is selling a shoddy EV and solar product at premium costs to other idiots, but very much aligned with Democrats on the two points above. Not only did he back the wrong horse, he straight up accidentally got on the wrong horse, and rode it threw towns away from where he was living very comfortably.

      Now this fucking moron needs to invent new ways to make Tesla appealing to the “normies” because nobody is buying his bullshit stalling tactics or premium pricing for sub-par products.

      I’ve got my popcorn ready, but the siphoning of votes away from Trump is just the butter on top.

      • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        I dont see how you can draw that conclusion for item 2. He claims to care about the deficit, not funelling money to billionaires. Belive me, he would have you living under a bridge eating gruel before he would touch anything that affects his wealth.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not sure I agree with point #2 - I’d be willing to bet he would love to funnel some of that sweet tax money into his own pocket, but he doesn’t want it in the form of tax breaks for income earners, he wants it in the form of EV subsidies for Tesla, which Trump denied him by cutting the EV tax incentive from the spending bill. I don’t think he even acknowledges that tax breaks for billionaires are bad for the economy, just that the big bullshit bill is bad for him specifically.

        On everything else, though, I agree wholeheartedly. His brand is toxic now, and without being able to sell a sub-par product at dirt-cheap prices, he’s going to get a heavy dose of reality when consumers reject his rolling coffins in favor of cheaper alternatives.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          If course you don’t. That’s why you side with Trump. The fact that “trickle down economics” has been disproven time and time again means nothing to you folks.

          • Furbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Huh? Did you reply to the wrong person? Because I don’t side with Trump. Check my comment history.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago
        1. EVs will never be the mainstream without federal and state project support

        in not sure about that… imo EVs would be relatively comparable if ICE vehicles and oil didn’t have massive subsidies at every stage from governments… more if negative externalities were properly accounted for

        or maybe not: in australia we have a fuel excise and EV credit and they’re still pretty expensive relative to ICE

        • dickalan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          I know you meant internal combustion engine, but it gave me a pause because I thought you were talking about ice agents

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            i absolutely agree and considered using a different phrase but it’s been the phrase to use for fossil fuel powered cars for so long i decided they don’t get to exclusively steal it

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          EV’s only become popular when cheaper. It’s a fact.

          Not everyone lives in areas where solar installs at ean option. The offset doesn’t make sense when you go north or south of the globe where the sun don’t shine.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think total cost of ownership is lower for EVs for people that have reasonable electricity rates and can charge at home, but that’s a tougher sell and most people aren’t even sure that it will work out unless they try it.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I hope this becomes big enough to split the right-wing vote. I wish him all the success possible.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Doesn’t seem terribly likely to me for Musk to concede before the election. There’s still something to gain from it being public knowledge how many voted for you last election. This did happen recently in BC, Canada though, where the established conservatives bowed out at the last minute to give votes to the new far-right party.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    The neo-Nazi saluting bastard wants a political party? F-him and strip him of US citizenship for illegally working in the USA.

    If anyone has a chance to create another party. AOC and Mamdani.

  • Waldschrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Now do another 10 or 20 parties more and maybe america could finally become a democratic country.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    I hope that he sloughs off enough support from the Geronocrats and Turdpublicans to give the Progressive movement a chance to become mainstream. In a battle between four armies, I think AOC would win.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      An AOC/Sanders ticket is starting to make sense, aside from Bernie’s age.

      Harris needs to stay away from this next race.

      Newsom is a fucking snake, and I wouldn’t for him to be prez.

      Whitmer and Gillibrand both just did a fast turn to fascistic and racist bullshit.

      Pritzker is a billionaire, but says the right things.

      If Mamdani does great shit really fast, he could be a VP pick in 2032, but he needs to prove some shit and can’t be president.

      I just feel like the field is pretty limited right now. We don’t have all the good ideas at all the right times from any candidates, but we have the best ideas right now through just a few people. Voters are desperate to displace all this bullshit that is happening right now, and we just need a better crop of candidates overall. This isn’t even on the left, but the right leaning people need to get some sane fucking choices back as well.

    • meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t think he’s THAT delusional. But he might be targeting the libertarian crypto fiends and techno-fascists that have gathered around the MAGA platform during the last election.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    How? I thought a prereq was to do a certain amount of philanthropy or action at the local level first.

    • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      157
      ·
      8 days ago

      Hopefully it has success at breaking us from our failed two party system, while at the same time the party itself fails (and costs him lot of money in the process).

      • ExFed@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        85
        ·
        8 days ago

        We’ll need ranked choice (or some other voting scheme other than First Past The Post). Otherwise it’ll just end up the same as it always has.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          8 days ago

          Need new rules in House and Senate, too. The majority party gets majority in all the committees, gets to pick all the committee chairs, etc. All of the current non-D/non-R members ‘caucus’ with one of the major parties, making them de facto members of that party. A third party with enough representation to block the other two from gaining majority would almost certainly end up in an alliance with one, leaving us back with functional two-party politics.

        • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’ll gladly accept a reactionary centrist spoiler party into the mix. Especially if it coincides with the Clinton wing of the DNC losing its ability to maintain its grip on power.

            • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              8 days ago

              The Dems who, since the shock of the Reagan revolution, swore off having a political project beyond “don’t make it worse” but accidentally foreclosed on making things better in the process. More recently, they’ve been heard saying things like “nothing will fundamentally change” in the face of a political situation that is very different from 40 years earlier.

              Basically all the powerful Dems since Bill Clinton. Groups like the Democratic Leadership Council. They’ll poo poo ideas that regularly poll at 80% support across all parties, then spend all their political capital barely carrying a compromise position with 48% support across the finish line.

              I really hope that we’re reaching a tipping point where people who believe in a better world and pursue policies to bring it about can have sustained political success

            • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Obviously, they’re nothing centrist about this guy (besides, perhaps, his perceived position in the universe). They are, in fact, reactionaries, so definitionally right wing. But they believe they are splitting the difference between the Stalinist left (exemplified by the NYT) and the fascist right (unbeknownst to them, them).

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yes, and without it, any third party struggles to take hold. This new party could make ranked choice voting a bipartisan(tripartisan?) issue since they would need it to survive unless they really think they can just yank all of the R votes their way.

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        8 days ago

        Breaking the US from the failed 2-party system would require replacing first-past-the-post voting with at least ranked choice, if not a proportional system like Hare-Clarke, and probably scrapping the Electoral College altogether. Which may require constitutional amendments, or at least a partisan Supreme Court sympathetic to more democracy that would Chewbacca-defence it through regardless of legality.

    • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      8 days ago

      Best case scenario is it will split the right wing vote. In Canada, we’re used to it going the other way with conservatives taking advantage of a split left.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 days ago

        Washington Post columnists said it would probably just capture the “Never Trumper” moderate Republican voters who currently begrudgingly vote Democratic because they understand that the Republican Party is nominating only yes-men and fascists.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            8 days ago

            Especially not their opinion column but I’m just posting here because it’s interesting to see what the neoliberals think about it and it’s a good discussion point

            • dragontamer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Washington Post is Murdoch connected as of December 2023 (new leader and Bezos began to flex his muscles at the paper). I hesitate to call it neoliberal. It’s moved right of that.

              • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                If you actually bother to read it (regularly, not just once or twice on selected columns that you saw posted online), you would not think that. The opinion column is very neoliberal with a hint of libertarianism.

                • dragontamer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  I was an active subscriber who regularly read WashPo.

                  Ruth Marcus, Alexandra Petri and a whole slew of other liberals have left the post after the 2024 election and various tampering by Jeff Bezos. Or have you not noticed the change of writers yourself??

                  The ones who remained are hardly NeoLiberal, but overall have shifted farther and farther right. Jeff Bezos killing a few key OpEds have made it clear to the liberals that they are no longer welcome at the Washington Post.


                  Or what? You gonna try to convince me that Hugh Hewitt is a liberal or some shit?

        • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          8 days ago

          The Dems leaned hard on the never Trumpers for votes last year and you can see where that got them. Elon can have them.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 days ago

          Republican never Trumper that doesn’t vote GOP is likely vanishingly small. They all fall in line.

          It might siphon off the GOP voters that begrudingly fell in line because they bought the Communist Kamala or something, or the ones that needed to see Trump disaster a second time.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Same with the USA, the US Green Party is funded by Conservative PACs such as Badger Values. If there were left unity then the 8 million people who showed up for Biden 2020 would have shown up for Harris 2024, but a lot of people are convinced the DNC aren’t left enough and that primary elections are shams.

    • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 days ago

      I want him to split the GOP vote. Basically just a Jill Stein that believes his own swill.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah…

      At best, it splits the MAGAt vote, making Dems a clear winner.

      At worst, it takes some GenZ dipshit votes away from Dems and causes chaos.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 days ago

            Cut the age blame crap. They did nothing different than the rest of our society. Don’t let our generations fall for the same tactics as the generations before us. Our war needs to be a class war, not some stupid “young people are lazy nowadays” bullshit that EVERY high horse ignorant person has said for the last 200 years. Do the youth a favor and look upon anyone who singles them out and trys to separate us with disgrace. Respect is a 2 way street. Let’s be better

            • dragontamer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              You youngsters will blame the next generation as well. You just aren’t old enough to see the pattern yet.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 days ago

          I think your beef should be with all men then. As Trump voters increased in men by age. So you could factually say Gen Z men were the least likely to vote for Trump as well

        • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          All/most of them, or a few mediagenic alt-right examples the press can trot out as proof of “young men want fascism and Latin Mass” when they run out of MAGA-hatted Ordinary Americans in flyover-state diners?

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          You should check those numbers, because it went 51% to Harris. Splitting that means good things for Dems though. Dilution through stupidity.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      If it splits the republican party and removes the old white billionaires from the dems than I’m 100% for it.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Success means a split of the Republicans, because the vast majority of Dems aren’t going to follow Elon after these last few months.

    • sprite0@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      of all the things to shit on him for this isn’t it. being multi cultural is the only culture we have and almost all of us are immigrants.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 days ago

        White rich South African are devoid of culture just like every other rich profligate. They have no nation, creed, or ideals just an insatiable avarice.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          That’s not true, the Musk family have a rich culture and long history of…

          *checks notes

          Supporting white supremacy and trying to overthrow democracy in several nations.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        If it’s an insult to that crowd then it’s worth rubbing it in, and it certainly is.