My partner and I have just binged TOS-Enterprise last year and we are starting Discovery today. I was just wondering if we can also start LD or will there still be jokes from Discovery (and the later shows) that we might miss out on? I have really bad FOMO anxiety and am worried there will be references in LD that we will miss because we havent watched any of the new shows yet.

      • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        If you’re saying that the 90s shows have more direct references in Lower Decks than Discovery, I can agree.

        I’d add The Animated Series too though. There are many Easter eggs from TAS included.

        However, the OP should be aware that Lower Decks is written to be enjoyed by those completely new to the franchise. The deep cuts are added value not a necessity. There are numerous new fans that watched Lower Decks and only later got to the other shows they reference and enjoy discovering in reverse.

        Discovery in-universe becomes a secret at a level that it’s not the kind of thing the Cerritos crew would know about from reading historic resources.

    • KirbyProton@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Probably get down voted for this but I’m new to Star Trek online discussion so be kind :) - people didn’t like Discovery?

      Sure it took a bit to find its feet but I thought the last series was excellent!

      But then I loved Picard by the end of series 3 too so many I’m alone here.

      Either way, loving all the Star Trek shows coming out these days, was nothing for so long and now…

      • Venicon@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think having multiple galaxy spanning events all spun around one particular character is the trouble for me. Didn’t mind Burnham but…spoilers ahead.

        Turns out she is related to spock. Oh and started the Klingon war. Oh and finished it. Oh and also she was the only one who stopped the apocalypse cos it was actually her mum who was a time traveller. Oh and she disobeyed all the orders but got to be captain. Oh and then something about another galaxy spanning event. I stopped watching not long after. Also part of the beauty of Trek for me has been the ensemble cast full of interesting characters. I honestly can’t remember any of the bridge crew apart from Burnham, Saru and Tilly.

        LD and SNW and Picard S3 are outstanding in my opinion.

      • joe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Keeping in mind that I’m just giving personal opinions, I found Discovery to be too… over acted? Maybe that was just how it was written but the end result, for me, was that I was constantly rolling my eyes while watching.

        Picard seemed okay but in the end I didn’t like the obvious appeals to nostalgia, for me it felt like it leaned too heavily on it instead of trying to stand on its own as a good show.

        I have no idea if my experiences align with the broader community or not, but I found myself forcing myself to watch each respective show so I didn’t bother watching when a new season came out.

        Please don’t take my comment as anything but me sharing my experiences with someone else who is a fan of the franchise.

        SNW I’m totally on board for, though. And I was hesitant about Lower Decks at first but it’s really a good show, imo. It’s so good that it has me questioning my decision to ignore The Orville for being too silly.

      • Jason - VE3MAL@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Star Trek discussion /usually/ tends toward anything new being bad, and always has. SNW and lower decks are exceptions because they do so much fan service and return to a more classic Trek format. Discovery was groundbreaking in a way that I’m sure Roddenberry would have enjoyed, but groundbreaking also implies jarring change and throwing away things that work for experiments that sometimes don’t.

      • Slim Bill (He/Him)@noc.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        @KirbyProton @PlasmaDistortion I love them both.
        There are a few episodes of TOS and Enterprise that I don’t much care for, but overall I believe that Gene Rodenberry, Gene Coons, and Dorothy Fontana have done more to define our role in the universe and our responsibilities to each other than Karl Marx.

        • PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          For me Discovery is enjoyable, but not as “Trek”. It is like a completely different show that lacks the charm of the other series. From a Lower Decks perspective, there are not too many references to it so it puts it at the bottom for someone wanting to understand LD better.

      • JWBananas@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If Discovery were as unpopular as some people really think it is, then none of the current shows would be in production.

    • startrekexplained@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Discovery doesn’t have a single good episode I’ve went back to revisit, while even the “weaker” series like ENT have episodes I revisit.

      • 3enhjz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        This. There are always specific episodes i like to rewatch but Discovery had none that stood out for me.