And so it begins…

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    All it takes is one fair election to be won decisively by an autocrat. The democratic party handed it to this shit head. Worst yet, he doesn’t even have to rig the election system because the democrat party is fucking incapable of attracting voters and it doesn’t look like they are going to fix what is broken about the party.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    Forever could be thankfully short thanks to his awful health and lifestyle.

    But then these damn Skeksis stay on the throne a lot longer than should be possible.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Good thing he’s old AF and overweight. Maybe that will impact him even before this term is done…

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          Remember that he went off the rails on Truth Social about the 25th amendment basically ranting about the chain of command when the president is incapacitated. It seemed like a weird one but I remember reading it and my first thought was “He found out his people are gonna throw him out with a dementia diagnosis.”

        • Hazor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I suspect (naively hope?) Vance would be less inclined to just hand over national security information to Putin, so … maybe two benefits?

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 minutes ago

            What about his behavior to date makes you think that? I feel like that sounds snarky but I don’t intend it that way.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 hours ago

    George W. Bush made a joke about being a dictator, but never tried to actually be one. Trump has been trying to be a dictator from the moment he was born…

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t see him lasting his full term. Dude’s old, is incredibly unhealthy, and has enough power-mad people around him that the first sign of weakness will probably be enough for medical intervention and Vance becoming president. Becoming president AGAIN at his age is possibly the dumbest thing he can do for his health.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Sadly his Klan loving father lived to 93, and being POTUS is like having a dedicated one person ER following you around.

      Also, the office only ages you if you’re committed to performing the job, Trump uses the office to troll the people he can troll and, more urgently, personally profit for anyone that offers him or his businesses a bribe in exchange for a Presidential act. He doesn’t work even in business, he issues broad, pie in the sky dictates and encourages his own employees infighting about the details. He’s bragged about this.

      Trump was the first President in my lifetime to accelerate the aging of those he governed rather than himself. Like so many other things people seem to forget, he spent a lot of his first term golfing.

      Not that I’m complaining on that point, golf motherfucker! Do less!

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This is something I don’t think they even acknowledge or think about. Some of their shit in comparing him to Hitler (and they do that in a positive manner) is when they claim that some of the shit that is happening to him is like him being imprisoned after the Beer Hall Putsch (referring to Jan 6th). This is stupid. Hitler was barely in his early 30s at the time and he was actually at the START of his political career. Trump was never imprisoned and when he did his shit he already had very real political power that Hitler never had in 1923.

      Trump the oldest presidential nominee ever and I hope that he will stay the oldest. We don’t need that kind of geriatic shit in any political office anywhere.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Let me get this right. So, you know exactly who this man is and what he stands for. Yet, you elect him anyway. You know he’s been “joking” about this before. Yet, you elect him anyway. He’s a convicted felon. Yet, you elect him anyway.

    I’ve lost every smidgen of respect I had for Americans. You went into this with eyes wide open. You deserve what’s coming.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      I’ve lost every smidgen of respect I had for Americans.

      Says the guy who is happy to damn tens of millions of people who didn’t vote for this (not to mention all the kids and such) right along with those who did.

    • nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Let me get this right. So, you know exactly who this man is and what he stands for. Yet, you elect him anyway. You know he’s been “joking” about this before. Yet, you elect him anyway. He’s a convicted felon. Yet, you elect him anyway.

      I’ve lost every smidgen of respect I had for Americans. You went into this with eyes wide open. You deserve what’s coming.

      60% of eligible voters didn’t vote. It can be debated if they are complacent or if party leadership didn’t Sufficiently motivate them to vote

      Of the 40% eligible voters that did vote, 50% voted for trump and 48% voted for Harris.

      So depending on how you look at it, 19% of eligible voters actively didn’t vote for Trump, or 20% of eligible voters actively voted for Trump.

      We could also go on to say that, of those who voted for trump, there was a portion that was not informed which could partially be blamed on the media as well as party leaderships. Some of them are just in a cult mentality and while that doesn’t excuse their behavior, they are actively being manipulated. And then there are a bunch of voters who genuinely just want to watch the world burn.

      I’m sure we could dissect this many ways, but i can can’t see how everyone deserves what’s coming. For example , I didn’t ask for this. I actively volunteered my time to try to prevent it. Yeah, a good chunk of Americans are idiots. But not all of us deserve what’s coming. Fuck that.

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You deserve what’s coming.

      You’re talking to the people who tried to stop him, so fuck off.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        He’s talking broadly, to Americans. Which you and I are. And he’s right, we deserve this. As a country.

        As an individual, neither of us do, since we fought and voted against him. But that’s not what OP was saying. He wasn’t addressing you specifically, but our nation in the second person.

        • leadore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 hours ago

          nope, it’s the usual European smug superiority complex I see all over Lemmy, as if they don’t have the same problems there (not to mention have had in the past). They can enjoy gloating until the same thing happens in their country, which won’t be long.

          • Tyfud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            You could be correct.

            However, Europe’s “right” is America’s “left”.

            The political situation might be semantically similar, but the political policymaking is a vastly different situation between the two.

            Europe, universally, believes in healthcare as a right, for example.

            • uxia@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 minutes ago

              It struck me reading your comment that there is literally nothing that all Americans believe in “universally” and that makes me super sad.

    • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I voted for Kamala, and got a handful of others to as well, don’t include me with the rest of them. I don’t deserve this.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Wow, already in the first week. Expect to hear this joke periodically over the course of his term, each time getting slightly more seriously stated. By the third year, everyone will have heard it so much it’ll be accepted as a perfectly reasonable idea. And the media will help that along in how they report on it. This is the tried and true playbook and it will work, not only for this plan but for their other plans.

    Take for example the planned mass deportations. They’ll start out with finding some people who have committed crimes (or they claim have), deport them and no one will object to that, it’s already how it’s done. As they move on to those whose crimes are not very consequential, like traffic tickets or whatever, if libs say anything against it, they’ll pounce on it and amplify stories how the libs are overreacting and want criminals to be left free and have open borders. Harping on any criticism in cases that are technically justified is key to getting the public used to pooh-poohing any dissent as they start escalating and going after the law-abiding (other than being here illegally ofc) immigrants, families with mixed status members, DACA/Dreamers, parents of children born here and thus citizens and deporting the children with them, etc.

  • recapitated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 hours ago

    He won’t stay in power. His appointment of incompetent sycophants will dismantle 250 years of American prosperity (maliciously or negligently, it doesn’t matter) and it will be sold for parts to billionaires and foreign states.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah; he’ll stay in power long enough for that.

      But he’s 78 years old. When he’s supposed to step down in 2029, he’ll be almost 83.

      The average life expectancy of men in the US is currently 73.

      Based on historical data for people Trump’s age and health in the US, he’s likely to die of natural causes before he’s 86.

      So the longest he could likely hang on for is one more term than he’s supposed to.

      • ziggurat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I bet he wants nepotism to for succession, but that’s not what his benifactors want, hence JD Vance

  • Bonifratz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    1 day ago

    Luckily, the process of repealing or changing an amendment likely won’t change anytime soon, even with a Republican trifecta at the federal level, as it requires overwhelming public support. As outlined in Article 5 of the Constitution, any such change requires at least two-thirds of the Senate and the House to agree on the modification, with that change then requiring ratification by a minimum of three-quarters of states in the nation.

    I wouldn’t be so confident. If the majority decides to ignore it, then a constitution suddenly holds very little weight. Remember how the Roman Empire was once a Republic, until someone decided it wasn’t anymore? Remember how 1930s Germany was a democracy, until someone decided that had to end?

    Trump might argue some weird logic regarding the 22nd and 12th amendment. Or he might just declare a state of national emergency because of a new migrant caravan or some such shit, and postpone elections indefinitely. If he tries anything of the sort, it will all come down to whose side the military is on.

    • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Burn the senate building, arrest some democrat kid and say there is a deep state satanic conspiracy with the democrats to destroy the God Appointed Trump Presidency, throw fake news all over the place and call for another election and/or emergency bill that gives him unlimited power.

      What is that thing about story not repeating itself but rhyming?

    • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 day ago

      What happens if they declare all democrats are enemies of the state and remove them from office and put their people in?

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, and that fuckwits name was Paul von Hindenburg in Germany.

      The fall of the Roman Republic was way more complex though wasn’t it? Like the Senate killed Ceaser and then voted to give his son unlimited tenure as Commander In Chief? There’s a lot to unpack there

      • Bonifratz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I didn’t mean “someone” this literally. In both cases, many people were directly involved or allowed things to happen by not intervening.

        My point was the more general one that a system of government only remains in place for as long as those who have the power want it to. (Whoever that may be: an elite, the people, the military, the clergy, some combination…) The US seems to be entering a phase where a big part of those in power wants to move from liberal democracy towards authoritarianism. If they turn out to have a stable majority and follow through with their plans, then the US Constitution won’t be worth more than the paper it was written on.

    • Dalvoron@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Can he just run as someone else’s VP and then the someone else abdicates or whatever? No messing with constitution required. Obviously requires a lot of trust though.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        No, the VP has to be eligible for the presidency. If for some reason they are not, then the presidency would roll to the speaker of the house.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Rules still apply until they are selectively removed or ignored or re-interperted by the Supreme Court of Sycophants later. But as it stands right now, those are the rules.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Remember, the Constitution is just a really old piece of paper if the people entrusted to enforce it choose to ignore it.

    There is a non-zero chance that Trump could move to suspend the Constitution entirely, backed by a complicit Cabinet, Congress, Supreme Court and several state governments. And at that point, we would literally have to hope and pray that the rank-and-file military is on the side of the people, which is far, far from guaranteed. Because if they’re not, you can claim your Constitutional rights all you want, but you’ll be doing it with the other prisoners inside of whatever re-education camp you’re assigned to.

    Heck, there’s a non-zero chance that the American voter just gives off a collective “meh” and just apathetically lets Trump seize total power. We just saw a few million people do just that.