• Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 month ago

      We had a majority of exactly 1 vote in the Senate and it was Joe fucking Manchin.

      People: Why didn’t Democrats accomplish more progressive things?

      Like, you’ve seen what Republicans want to pass, right??

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            30 days ago

            That percentage is meaningless when things that Lord Manchington doesn’t like don’t even come up for a vote.

            • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              29 days ago

              He’s not the Senate Majority Leader and doesn’t control what comes to a vote. I just don’t see the point of vilifying a centrist when there are 50 other lunatics that vote against progress 100% of the time. Manchin voted for all the judges, infra, chips, IRA, all the budget stuff, etc. Lets focus on the real problem - way too many GOP senators.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                29 days ago

                He’s not the Senate Majority Leader and doesn’t control what comes to a vote.

                The Senate Majority Leader doesn’t usually waste time on things he knows can’t pass because one centrists is willing to stick his neck out and do what all centrists want.

                As far as judges, he voted to confirm Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.

                • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  My point isn’t to defend the guy, it’s to put some context around the fact that half the Senate is even worse, so this is a disproportionate amount of villification. Let’s say he had an R next to his name, we then have a R majority leader and the whole Senate grinds to a halt. Then will you magically give him a pass because now being an asswipe is fully expected of him? That’s the kid gloves treatment you’re giving to the other 50 GOP senators that are the actual problem.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        We had a majority of exactly 1 vote in the Senate and it was Joe fucking Manchin.

        There are always enough Manchins.

        • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 month ago

          Gotta shift that Overton window first. Votes can do that slowly, if we can do it consistently enough (local elections too, not just the presidential one.)

          That probably won’t be enough on its own, of course, but it’s certainly not nothing.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            1 month ago

            That one might actually happen because of how fucking pissed everyone is and because minimum wage employers don’t lobby as much as health insurers, drug manufacturers, and PBMs.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 month ago

        If I remember right, the Affordable Care Act passed the Senate 60-39 along party lines on December 24, 2009, and passed the House 219-212. That’s really ragged edge stuff. Universal healthcre was considered, but too many votes would have been lost to pass a resolution which incorporated it. They did what they could.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        30 days ago

        I mean, maybe. Exactly how Dem is this Congress? Because we’re gonna have to have enough Dems that we can lose a few and still win the vote.

        Unless, of course, you think we can get some Republicans on board. It’s almost like the main problem isn’t the few Dems that won’t play along, like Manchin and Lieberman. Maybe the main issue is Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), JD Vance (R-OH), and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), and the fact that I could have listed 47 other Republicans here, and that’s just if I stick to the Senate.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 month ago

    Talk about a tautological statement. Dems need Dems to get anything done because of the shitbag obstructionist repubs who want to hinder all progress. It’s like saying people need air to breathe.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    30 days ago

    Democratic majorities don’t pass agendas. If we get a majority in both chambers, we’ll get to see who the new Manchin is. My money is on one of the candidates that the foreign genocidal apartheid regime bought.