In the balance between geopolitical conflicts and Linux, the latter is the petty stuff.

holy shit lol

Scale always matters, it is the anchor point for shared communication.

The one where a human is speaking in English and referring to a season and the temperature is more than significant context. I hope this helped you; it seems that you’re one of those people who lack the capacity to infer from available data.

It’s still assuming a scale. It’s actually worse because the scale is implied by context.

18.0.1 seems to have fixed my battery issues on a 16p. My Watch Ultra was losing 75% of its charge over the course of a day until the 11.0.1 update. That seems to have returned it to normal. I don’t understand how this keeps happening with version updates, though. Having complete control of the hardware and a small number of models to test for should completely eliminate this kind of issue through basic testing.

This is it. The Pro in this new Mini has a disabled GPU core. They’re offloading low-binned leftover chips.

The Watt predates the SI itself. SI borrows the Watt much as it dues with other units.

Jesus, how bad does your sacrificial anode look?

This is Core Inflation in the OP. It’s actually a basket of baskets of goods.

This is why I come to Lemmy — for people with even a passing understanding of the topics on which they speak confidently.

No. Next question.

Makes sense.

Happy to help! And, I totally feel you on the ragdoll thing. I’ve got a lot of dollars in loans in repayment from law school and it would be nice to just be able to work on a budget that I knew wasn’t going to change drastically in a few months (again).

You’ve actually stated one of the main reasons that TROs are issued. One of the required showings by the petitioning party is to demonstrate “imminent” and “irreparable harm.” In this case the imminent is shown by the plan’s policies and planned implementation as well as the fact that there was a date promulgated for commencement. Irreparable harm would be demonstrated by something similar to your scenario – the petitioner would argue that if it goes into effect and the final determination is that it should not have been permitted to go into effect, that monies which should have been rightfully collected are forever lost, absent an otherwise unnecessary affirmative and costly process of collecting on the marginal difference of payments owed.

To more directly answer your question, the court would direct the companies to collect in a manner which is least onerous to both parties (debtor and creditor); likely a long period of increased collections or (IMHO, more likely) extending the payment period to collect the now-again additional amount due.

I agree with you though, I think given the circumstances and gravity to individual debtors in this case the prudent thing is to stay implementation of the program.

It’s both. The case is being transferred and the program can go into effect (unless the new venue issues a TRO).

Me too, buddy. Me too.

It’s not moving the race, at all. It may affect the VP candidates’ approval rating.

Th OP article is the Senate, you’re right. The House is the easier fix, though.

Yet another reason to increase the size of the House to 1000 members.