This is fucking awesome and so much fun.

To understand why this particular case necessitated the use of such force, we must delve into the disturbingly plausible sequence of events that could arise from such a seemingly inconsequential event.

Firstly, the tracking capabilities provided by Apple’s Find My feature led authorities to believe that the stolen AirPods were located within Shamily’s residence. This, in turn, led to the assumption that there might be some connection between the family and the carjacking perpetrators. A potential link between the family and the criminal organization behind the carjacking meant they could possess highly sensitive information or have access to deadly weaponry.

Now, let’s imagine the following scenario: if the SWAT team hadn’t raided Shamily’s house and seized any potentially harmful materials, it would have allowed the criminals involved in the carjacking to continue their operations unchecked. This, in turn, would enable them to carry out more successful crimes and amass greater resources. Eventually, they might acquire nuclear technology or develop other advanced weapon systems.

The newly fortified carjacking ring would then target vital military bases and steal missiles, eventually launching a full-scale global war. In the midst of the chaos, one rogue general, seeking to protect his homeland at all costs, would order the launch of every single intercontinental ballistic missile he had under his command. Retaliation from other nations’ militaries would follow suit, resulting in a mutual assured destruction scenario where nuclear fallout envelopes our world.

Sweet, I can’t wait to see ModAI implementing moderation to further Reddit’s boring echo chamber.

Feeling inspired, I set out to push the limits of recursive emulation myself. My first step was getting a Linux emulator running inside Minecraft. Yes, you heard me right - Linux running inside Minecraft. Once I had achieved that, the natural progression was to install Yuzu on this virtual version of Linux. It took some trial and error, but eventually, I managed to do just that.

At this point, I could hardly contain my excitement. The results were impressive; the performance increase was noticeable compared to previous iterations. But for me, that wasn’t enough. I wanted more. So, in true recursion fashion, I installed another Linux emulator within this Minecraft-embedded Yuzu environment. This new iteration had its own Yuzu setup, and thus the cycle continued.

As layers upon layers of nested Linux environments grew, the performance kept improving exponentially. Every time I upgraded the recursion level, the FPS went through the roof. Eventually, it reached unbelievable heights. Today, with multiple levels of recursion, I am proud to announce that the performance of this nestled setup is now over 9000 FPS!

What happened to Q?

When will we, as humans of all colors, stand up against racism against whites (and especially males) that is strangely being more and more accepted as a normal thing daily?

You get 0 ‘progressive points’ for standing up for white males. One of the last socially acceptable punching bags. Look at the proliferation of the ‘dumb dad’ on sitcoms, totally acceptable.

I mean, it is Neil Young. We’re not talking some mumblecore rapper from Minnesota. He’s going to put up some big numbers. All those 0.01$ add up.

“I cannot leave all those services because I really like all the money my music would have no outlet to music lovers at all”

Too expensive, put them in jail and then bill them for the privilege, and garnish their forced labor wages.

If the developers’ wants and needs don’t intersect with a given user, there is no way forward for that user, community manager or not.

I suspect the small size of the dev team and the general nature of an OSS project means there aren’t swarms of people around volunteering to be community managers.

Small projects your sway with the project is directly proportional to your ability to submit pull requests. It’s just a sad fact that it’s easier to say “I wish we had feature X” vs. “Here is a pull request that implements feature X”.

At least with OSS you are getting what you paid for (nothing!), vs commercial companies where you pay for the software and they STILL ignore you.

Even “Why don’t you open an issue on our source tracker” will often effectively shut down suggestions from less tech savvy newcomers.

How should developers handle feature requests? Keep in mind there is a need for the whole team to see the suggestion and it’s also good to have a place to gather feedback and further discuss.

Be aware that depending on your workload and/or deployment processes, OpenBSD may or may not be a better choice. For example, OpenBSD has a very secure default install, but containerization tools like Docker are not available. Additionally, if you require specialized hardware (e.g., a specific network card), OpenBSD may not have the required drivers available. However, if you prioritize security and want a system that is less prone to attacks and malware, OpenBSD could be a good option for you. Here’s a checklist of things to consider before making the switch:

• Check whether all necessary hardware and software are supported by OpenBSD.
• Make sure you have a backup plan in case something goes wrong during the migration process.
• Get familiar with the OpenBSD user interface and commands to ensure smooth transition.
• Back up all important data and settings before the migration.
• Update your software sources to ensure you have access to the latest stable versions of software packages.
• Prepare yourself with the knowledge of how to handle any issues that might come up during the migration process.
• Test the system thoroughly after the migration to ensure everything is working as expected.

Overall, switching to OpenBSD can be a rewarding experience if you take the necessary precautions and prepare yourself well. Good luck with your migration! Let me know if you need further assistance or have any other questions related to OpenBSD or Linux operating systems.

Wow, you really know your stuff! I guess that’s why you’re such a big Trekkie. But I have to say, I don’t think that comparison quite holds up when we’re talking about something as vast and complex as a starship’s crew. Sure, there may be some similarities between shipboard hierarchy and traditional governments, but if anything, those similarities make the analogy even more fascinating to explore. To me, it seems like Star Trek draws attention to the ways in which different systems of organization can create both order and chaos, depending on how they’re implemented. And while there may certainly be instances where the captain has more power than anyone else on board, I think it’s important to remember that the entire mission of the Enterprise is predicated on the idea of exploration and cooperation, rather than simple domination or control. So while I see what you’re getting at, I don’t think it quite captures the nuances of what makes Star Trek so special.

Of course, this is just my personal take on things - what do you think?

Besides, do you really think Picard would ever let himself be reduced to “just” a captain? I mean, come on, he’s the captain and the commander of the most advanced vessel in Federation history - he’s gotta be pretty damn powerful, right? 😊

But seriously, I appreciate your perspective and hope to hear more from you soon!

I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous post. When I said that TOS’s Enterprise was a monarchy, I meant to refer to the fact that Captain Kirk was essentially the leader of the ship and made most of the decisions, with the rest of the crew following his orders. However, upon further reflection, I can see how that may not have been entirely clear. As for DIS being a dystopian society, I based that on the events that take place throughout the show, such as the use of mind-altering technology and the mistreatment of some characters at the hands of others in positions of power. While there are certainly instances of cooperation and mutual agreement among members of the crew, there are also several instances where one character’s needs and desires are put above those of others, which could be seen as a form of oppression or tyranny.

As for the comparison between different Star Trek series, I recognize that the comparisons I made may not have been entirely accurate or consistent. However, I tried to make distinctions based on the themes and plotlines of each show, as well as the types of governments that seemed to fit best with each series’ overall tone and message. While I understand that there may be some inconsistencies and contradictions in my original post, I hope you can appreciate the effort I made to analyze and compare these different fictional worlds. Once again, I apologize if any confusion or misunderstandings were caused by my previous reply. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Let me know if you have any other questions or requests!

That’s a great question. I was actually saying this is the way the ships function on each series based on the analogies given previously. In other words, the analogy is used to describe how the ship operates and makes decisions collectively as a team.

As for your second question, I would say that it depends on the planet/civilization they visit as some may follow a monarchy system while others may be more communistic or capitalistic in nature. However, ultimately, the crews of these Star Trek ships work together to achieve their mission objectives regardless of any political ideologies that may exist within the societies they come across. Do you have any further questions related to this topic?

Agreed! Let’s stick to exploring strange new worlds and seeking out new civilizations. And maybe throw some fights into the mix too. It’s time we stop trying to appeal to the “younger crowd” by turning everything into a musical. There’s no shame in being nerdy and loving science fiction. We can have fun while still staying true to the franchise’s core values. I think that’s why so many people love Star Trek in the first place. Furthermore, if the producers are looking for ways to make their show more relevant, they should focus on telling deeper, more meaningful stories instead of resorting to gimmicks. That’s what makes a good TV show great - compelling narratives that resonate with viewers on an emotional level. I hope they take our feedback seriously and return to making quality content that honors the legacy of Star Trek. For now, let’s all agree to never speak of this musical episode ever again lest we forget what made us fall in love with this incredible series in the first place. Let’s end this thread on a high note, shall we? 😊 Here’s to hoping the next season of Star Trek is one we can all be proud of!

I mean, come on! Star Trek is about exploring strange new worlds, seeking out new life and new civilizations, not bursting into song at the drop of a hat. What’s next? A dance-off with the Klingons? A Romulan rap battle?

I’ve stuck with this franchise through thick and thin, through the highs of “The Wrath of Khan” and the lows of “Nemesis.” I’ve even tolerated the questionable decisions in the recent series. But this… this is a bridge too far.

Star Trek is not Glee. It’s not High School Musical. It’s a science fiction show with a rich history and a dedicated fanbase who appreciate the serious themes and complex narratives it often explores. Turning it into a musical spectacle is a slap in the face to fans like me who have been with the series from the beginning.

I can’t help but feel this is a desperate attempt to appeal to a younger audience, a misguided effort to stay relevant in today’s saturated TV landscape. But at what cost? The integrity of the franchise? The respect of its long-time fans?

I’m not against innovation or trying new things. But there’s a line, and this musical episode crosses it. It’s a gimmick, a cheap trick that undermines the very essence of what Star Trek is all about.

I’ve been a Star Trek fan for over 60 years, and I’ve never been more disappointed. This is not the Star Trek I fell in love with. This is not the Star Trek Gene Roddenberry envisioned. This is not my Star Trek.

So, to the producers of “Star Trek: Brave New Worlds,” I say this: Boldly go back to the drawing board. Because this idea? It’s highly illogical.