The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoThey're not worth it!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up11.53K
arrow-up11.52KimageThey're not worth it!lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squarecallyral@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up125·1 year agoWhat’s weirder is that the bottom two are 6 feef apart
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down2·1 year agoAmericans will use anything but metric
minus-squareGrammaton Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up70·1 year agoI wouldn’t touch the metric system with a 10-foof pole.
minus-squareRukmer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 year agoThat made me laugh so hard I woke up my cats.
minus-squareBrownian Motion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoThe correct answer is 2.58 metres.
minus-squareWtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
minus-squarerustydomino@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoOr analytical geometry, for that matter.
minus-squareassa123@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoThis actually makes the problem solvable edit: in 2-D. Even without the typo it was solvable in 3-D.
What’s weirder is that the bottom two are 6 feef apart
Americans will use anything but metric
I wouldn’t touch the metric system with a 10-foof pole.
That made me laugh so hard I woke up my cats.
The correct answer is 2.58 metres.
deleted by creator
Or analytical geometry, for that matter.
This actually makes the problem solvable
edit: in 2-D. Even without the typo it was solvable in 3-D.
deleted by creator