• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    8 months ago

    The fundamental difference is who is in control, and for what purpose.

    American spyware is controlled by corporations, and is all about selling you shit you don’t need.

    Chinese (and Russian) spyware is–apparently–controlled rather directly by their respective governments, and is being used to suppress democracy and increase polarization in the US and EU.

    I don’t like any spyware. But the latter category–spyware that’s functionally state-sponsored–is clearly more immediately dangerous. The former is more like a slow-growing cancer.

  • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    My main reason is I’m an American, China (probably) can’t do shit to me. But here I’m subject to so much shit America can do legally and illegally, with zero repercussions.

    If China fucked me in particular over, odds are it would at least spark debate here. If America spied on my messages and stopped me from protesting something, that’s just a Tuesday afternoon here.

    The only reason why Congress wants to ban it, is due to pressure from news agencies and the government, because TikTok can’t be controlled by the CIA. You can’t manufacture consent of the people if the content comes from someone else you don’t control.

    https://www.npr.org/2024/03/13/1237501725/house-vote-tiktok-ban

    They’ll ban tiktok but won’t punish overly aggressive police.

    They’ll ban tiktok but won’t make food or rent affordable.

    They’ll ban tiktok but won’t denounce Israel’s bullshit.

    They’ll ban tiktok but won’t cancel student loans.

    They’ll ban tiktok but won’t take Covid seriously.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      2013: Microsoft handed the NSA access to encrypted messages

      Microsoft has collaborated closely with US intelligence services to allow users’ communications to be intercepted, including helping the National Security Agency to circumvent the company’s own encryption, according to top-secret documents obtained by the Guardian.

      The files provided by Edward Snowden illustrate the scale of co-operation between Silicon Valley and the intelligence agencies over the last three years. They also shed new light on the workings of the top-secret Prism program, which was disclosed by the Guardian and the Washington Post last month.

      • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well yeah, by default Microsoft holds your encryption keys. Why wouldn’t they be able to unencrypt it? Implement Customer Key if you want to hold your own encryption keys.

  • tiredcapillary@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not big of a fan of Chinese surveillance but to most peoples point that have already posted here, if this was about privacy then the government should be passing laws to protect consumer privacy as a whole and not just targeting Chinese companies. Really shows that the government doesn’t give a shit about your privacy just who’s able to get it.

    • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      https://www.npr.org/2024/03/13/1237501725/house-vote-tiktok-ban

      Advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, have called the bill “censorship plain and simple,” arguing that “jeopardizing access to the platform jeopardizes access to free expression.”

      At 27 years old, Florida Democratic Rep. Maxwell Frost is the youngest member of Congress, and he opposes the bill.

      “I think that it is a violation of people’s First Amendment rights,” he said. “TikTok is a place for people to express ideas. I have many small businesses in my district and content creators in my district, and I think it’s going to drastically impact them too.”

      The fact that Republicans started it is enough for me to be at least suspicious of why its even being considered.

      EDIT: Also lol at “strong first amendment rights” when redneck states ban any books with queer or black characters. And lmao at “Strong first amendment rights” when people get fired for talking about forming a union, let alone even trying to make one.

  • peepee_longstonking@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The concern about TikTok acquiring your private information for marketing purposes is a red herring. The concern of our government here is propaganda and narrative control – power.

  • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    If I had a nickel for every time I saw one of these posts, I’d have two nickels, Which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice on the same day

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I am tired of the unspoken Western Big Tech apologia. TikTok OBJECTIVELY collects far lesser data than Big Tech apps and services, according to reports from 2 reputed data collection analysis companies. Moreover, the below assumes you have an account, which is not even needed to use TikTok, unlike Instagram or Snapchat.

      https://clario.co/blog/which-company-uses-most-data/ https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/insights/info-tech-companies-collecting-from-you

      One of the key important aspects of threat modelling for your desired privacy is the acceptance of facts instead of false nationalist opinions.

      Moreover, while TikTok collects basic data, it never forces you to login other than for commenting (for obvious reasons) and similarly personal things, unlike Instagram. If you open an IG link in web browser, you cannot replay the video second time, and if you scroll the account’s posted images and videos, you will not be able to flick through a second time.

      Unlike Tiktok, with Western platforms and services like Facebook, you give phone number, contact book, IMEI, location data, email, some name or pseudonym et al. With TikTok, none, because you do not need an account for it.

      Facebook/Instagram and major Western platforms’ data collection on a user is more than what TikTok does on a user, even if there is an account on both services. On top of this, TikTok does not have tracking pixels, ad networks, CDN and other methods of tracking on other websites, unlike Facebook ecosystem. This allows Facebook ecosystem to correlate, interlink and form data clusters on users and IP addresses. Remember how Facebook ecosystem disallows accountless access? Or how they C&D’d Barinsta developer Austin Huang, citing they dislike anonymous access to Instagram?

      Western platforms also inject malware in browser using domains like https://netseer-ipaddr-assoc.xy.fbcdn.net/, something TikTok does not do if you do not have an account.

      This is precisely what makes TikTok objectively so harmless without an account, and even with an account, relatively far less harmful. It does not mean TikTok does not collect data, but the difference is too wide. These are the facts, free of American nationalist propaganda.

      I do not even use TikTok.

      • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I read through the first link you provided, it doesn’t align with your claim “TikTok OBJECTIVELY collects far lesser data than Big Tech apps and services.”

        We go section by section


        The companies collecting your face, voice & environment

        TikTok is worst here, collection all possible voice, face, environment data


        What can companies tell from image recognition?

        Again TikTok infer as much information as possible, worst among all listed.


        The later couple section did not mention tiktok, so I cannot compare it.

        Finally

        the 5 social media apps that know most about you

        TikTok ranked number 3 in among all the social media, above clubhouse and twitter, just below facebook and instagram.

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Now remove the need to use TikTok’s app and account, and count what all metrics get sent when you use it like that. You can use TikTok freely in any web browser. That makes it WAY better than any Western Big Tech services.

          And no, TikTok is NOT the worst in any category, and is far below Facebook and Instagram.

          You misinterpret the data shown in there, and ignore what I said about not needing an account. Services like Instagram make it mandatory to have an account and its app to use it.

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          once the data gets sent to a Chinese server, it’s gone. It’s like a void.

          This sounds insanely xenophobic and racist.

          Those “data collections analysis” can speculate, but they truly have no idea what happens with that data.

          The one doing speculation is you. Analysis is not speculation. Maybe check a dictionary.

          it’s demonstrable wrong to say that they collect less data.

          I wouldn’t say

          Facts or feelings. Choose one. You have not yet chosen facts.

  • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tankies failing to comprehend the fundamental difference between an actor who tries to make money off you and an actor trying to manufacture dissent and influence the public narrative

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Point taken, though it’s still an American company they could crack down upon if they prove too dangerous too.

        To be clear: I don’t want to get spied upon by anyone and I don’t use most of the American services for that reason. But obviously domestic bad actors are better than bad actors controlled by a foreign and hostile government

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It would be a lot better if Congress could pass a comprehensive privacy bill, but we lack a functioning government so I guess this is the best we can do.

          Greatest democracy in the world, right here.

        • trebuchet@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s crazy to me that people such as you unironically believe the position you’re saying that American companies are easier to crack down on.

          We are literally seeing concrete proof in action that domestic companies are much harder to crack down on or regulate. They are much better positioned to lobby and are currently using their immense political power to protect themselves while removing their foreign rivals. There isn’t even talk of taking action against them because they are so politically powerful.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            … it’s obvious because a domestic entity is subject to local laws, and can if push comes to shove be shut down or nationalized. A foreign one is essentially out of reach.

              • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                Why is it contentious that a government can better curb foreign interference if it is done on a domestic platform? Regardless of how shitty the United States are that’s a simple fact and also practiced by China, only to a much greater extent.

            • saga@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              The existence of the article you’re literally commenting on directly refutes what you’re saying here. Like you’re in a thread because of news that demonstrates that the opposite of what you’re saying here is actually true.

              If you need more examples - What happened to Facebook after the Cambridge Analytica scandal? They got banned by congress right? They got shut down? The government stopped them from continuing to manipulate the public?

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      trying to manufacture dissent and influence the public narrative

      That shit is all over American social media too buddy. If that’s the issue it should all be banned.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      trying to manufacture dissent and influence the public narrative

      Damn, was Noah Chomsky talking about China in his masterclass documentary?

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Read the other comments, I don’t want to repeat myself for every idiot jumping on the dogpile. Why does every single China fan assume I love the United States and have a blind eye towards their bullshit? I’m not an American.

              • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                But I am not accusing you of anything…? Unless you think asking you to check If what you’re about to comment has been commented several times before is an accusation.

                It’s okay though I’m just about done arguing over this topic. All responses can essentially be summed up with “but the USA do it too”.

                • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  You pretend you are objective, while insinuating the motive of USA companies is solely to make money and advertise, while China is the big baddie “narrative” manipulator, which is some alternate reality bullshit. China is not the country that has done foreign interventions and/or genocides in 100+ countries. Or stuff like the genocide in Myanmar which Facebook facilitated, or the intentional misreporting Reuters did during Tiananmen Square to make it look like those CIA paycheck “democracy” students who burnt PLA soldiers alive first were good people.