I’d expected this but it still sucks.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.worldEnglish
    93·
    9 months ago

    Regrettably, there is currently no substitute product offered.

    I really don’t think you regret a God damn thing broadcom.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.caEnglish
      261·
      9 months ago

      If you’re already running windows, hyper-v. theres proxmox, and tons of others. So they are mistaken. 🤣

        • yeehaw@lemmy.caEnglish
          3·
          9 months ago

          I know, but this is the way I read it when they claim to give no option.

      • TheHolm@aussie.zoneEnglish
        312·
        9 months ago

        All of them not equate in same league. Do you know any type 1 free supervises out there? Xen probably.

        • yeehaw@lemmy.caEnglish
          231·
          9 months ago

          Proxmox, Xen, hyper-v are all considered type 1 as far as I’m aware.

        • jelloeater - Ops Mgr@lemmy.worldEnglish
          11·
          9 months ago

          I’m not sure why you’re getting down voted, you’re right. I’m not sure if anyone would run Proxmox for their enterprise hypervisor? I mean HyperV is okay. Slim pickings for big orgs. I know there’s Nutanix, but most folks are moving to the big three for VMs and hosting.

          • ssdfsdf3488sd@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            9 months ago

            I am running proxmox at a moderately sized corp. The lack of a real support contract almost kills it, which is too bad because it is a decent product