I’d expected this but it still sucks.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    If you’re already running windows, hyper-v. theres proxmox, and tons of others. So they are mistaken. 🤣

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I know, but this is the way I read it when they claim to give no option.

    • TheHolm@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      All of them not equate in same league. Do you know any type 1 free supervises out there? Xen probably.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Proxmox, Xen, hyper-v are all considered type 1 as far as I’m aware.

      • jelloeater - Ops Mgr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not sure why you’re getting down voted, you’re right. I’m not sure if anyone would run Proxmox for their enterprise hypervisor? I mean HyperV is okay. Slim pickings for big orgs. I know there’s Nutanix, but most folks are moving to the big three for VMs and hosting.

        • ssdfsdf3488sd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I am running proxmox at a moderately sized corp. The lack of a real support contract almost kills it, which is too bad because it is a decent product