fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoCan't we just talk about it without the maths? Guys?mander.xyzimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up177
arrow-up175imageCan't we just talk about it without the maths? Guys?mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareseSvxR3ull7LHaEZFIjM@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down1·1 year agoI hate to tell you but philosophy has its own branch of basically math (logic). You need math to prove things :(
minus-squareacockworkorange@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 year agoIt’s more like math uses logic as a tool to prove things.
minus-squareALostInquirer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoIs that in the form of the supporting statistical data, for the maths alone, or…? For logic I have a better understanding, but maths has been more of a struggle for me.
minus-squareF04118F@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 year agoIt’s nothing to do with statistics, “just” logic. But most people find that it starts to feel like maths real quick. If you want to try it: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/24-241-logic-i-fall-2009/
I hate to tell you but philosophy has its own branch of basically math (logic). You need math to prove things :(
It’s more like math uses logic as a tool to prove things.
Is that in the form of the supporting statistical data, for the maths alone, or…? For logic I have a better understanding, but maths has been more of a struggle for me.
It’s nothing to do with statistics, “just” logic. But most people find that it starts to feel like maths real quick.
If you want to try it: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/24-241-logic-i-fall-2009/