• ynthrepic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Democrats reject this guy, a worse candidate is put forward next. Seems like a stupid hill to die on. They’re going to appoint somebody.

    Edit: I didn’t know he’d be confirmed anyway. If true, then I agree a Democratic rejection out of principle would have been a better statement.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Technically, if the Democrats reject this guy he still gets confirmed. If every Democrat, Independent, and also 3 Republicans reject this guy, he still gets confirmed. As was the case with Pete Hegseth, whom is way worse than Purdue in every way.

    • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      No, they’re not. What happened to Obama’s scotus pick proves you can gum up this process and prevent appointments. And you can do it without losing voters.

      Democrats are choosing to aide the trump admin.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The senate rules changed, if I remember correctly in 2013 and 2017, so that presidential appointments and scotus judges could not be filibustered. A simple majority can change the rules for the next congress and the majority party is Republican and the next congress will either be a Democrat majority or it will be a full on dictatorship.

      • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Nobody is voting for another year and a half. And hardly anyone for another three and a half years. Democrats need to pick the battles that matter.

    • 3abas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Let me get this clearly: because if they fight back, maga will be even nastier, so Dems did the right thing to save us from a worse outcome?

      Well fuck me, I’ve been at unfair to them. I owe them an apology.

      • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        That’s not what I said. There are better ways to fight.

        Fight the turly terrible candidate choices, not the ones who you might actually have a chance of working productively with.

        Chuck Schumer is abysmal and needs to step down, and he was wrong about the budget. But the essence of his argument has some truth - politics is a two-way street. In the rare case where there is a possibility of cooperation, that sets a better standard and will likely be more effective than endless partisanship.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Fight the turly terrible candidate choices, not the ones who you might actually have a chance of working productively with.

          Things centrists never say about progressives. Because centrists only have intentions of working with their republican buddies to accomplish their mutual goals.

          • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I think you’re being understandably but uncessarily cynical for the purposes of this conversation.

            I proudly call myself a far-leftist. Even a “woke” one. But victory for the ideals that drive us will not come from endless othering of those who we disagree with. Perfect is the enemy of the good, so the saying goes. I would say it’s now the enemy of even just a little bit better as opposed to so much worse.

            With that being said, we should never compromise on expressing what we actually believe. I want universal basic income, guaranteed minimum income according to a livable wage, weath taxes, and much more aggressive income taxation of the 1% and 0.1%. I want universal healthcare, open borders, and end to private prisons. But fuck me if I won’t vote to make what social security we do have just a little bit better.

            As politicians and lawmakers, we need to be the bigger party in the room that doesn’t stoop to their level.

            I know right now things demand radical defence of democracy, but that doesn’t happen by politicians giving up what little power and platform they might have. They can go to work when they’re not out on the streets with the protestors.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I think you’re being understandably but uncessarily cynical for the purposes of this conversation.

              Every time I think I’m too cynical, democrats prove me wrong. They don’t get to come back from supporting a genocide.

              I proudly call myself a far-leftist. Even a “woke” one.

              But?

              But victory for the ideals that drive us will not come from endless othering of those who we disagree with.

              Oh yeah. Wouldn’t want to other those people who carry swastika flags and chant “Jews will not replace us” after all, they’re the only demographic that matters to the democratic party, and they’re willing to throw all of us under the bus for a 1% chance at getting a single nazi vote. You’re bus fodder just like me and don’t you forget it. The femtosecond republicans express the slightest displeasure at your existence, you’ll be under the bus with all the disposables you don’t consider worth defending because it might other some contemptible nazi.

              With that being said, we should never compromise on expressing what we actually believe.

              With every betrayal, democrats converge on expressing what they actually believe.

              I want universal basic income, guaranteed minimum income according to a livable wage, weath taxes, and much more aggressive income taxation of the 1% and 0.1%. I want universal healthcare, open borders, and end to private prisons.

              There is no major party that does not fight against everything you claim to stand for here.

              As politicians and lawmakers, we need to be the bigger party in the room that doesn’t stoop to their level.

              We’re dealing with nazis. You don’t win over nazis by appeasement. You don’t win them over with magnanimity. They do not want to parlay. They want you dead.

              I know right now things demand radical defence of democracy, but that doesn’t happen by politicians giving up what little power and platform they might have.

              Then maybe they should stop giving up whatever power they have every time they have the opportunity to do so.

      • NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Someone has to be ambassador to China.

        It’s probably going to be someone most on the left so not want.

        So you choose the one that you can stomach while you have a vote.

        Just to note, but even Republicans stonewalled every confirmation.