• wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m confused how you think DEI is discrimination- its entire purpose is to make reviewers cognizant of their own biases to make hiring more based on merit. There is no quota. There is no agenda to put unqualified people on top

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m honestly confused how you don’t. If they wanted to make things unbiased, they’d just anonymise them. But they don’t, they put a spotlight on their race and gender. That adds bias, it doesn’t get rid of it.

      • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Making people aware of their biases is not discrimination nor favoritism- it is removing favoritism for equal odds for everyone. In short, “here’s a problem we have as a community- you should be aware of it when you are hiring so you treat people equally.” It’s clear you don’t even understand the problem- you can’t remove people’s innate characteristics when they come to your work for an interview, so obviously you make it so the people interviewing are less biased. The only way to make people less biased is to inform them of their possible biases.