• WagnasT@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    we need laws that require companies to unlock boot loaders when they drop support, or at least provide the means to do so.

  • rshalom@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really true. Plenty of Linux distributions dropped 32bit support years ago and 32bit systems are a lot younger than 20 years (last ones were some Intel Atoms released around 2010).

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      When talking about Linux desktops it includes distros like Debian, who will support i386 until, at least 2028. Even some fast moving distros like OpenSuse Tumbleweed still support i386.

    • Hellfire103@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have Linux running strongly on two laptops from 2007. If I still had my old Dell from 2003, I’d bet I could get the latest Puppy Linux running on it. Maybe even something like Debian or Arch32, if I maxed out the RAM.

      • notTheCat@lemmy.fmhy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve tried Arch32 a while ago, the project isn’t that well maintained (like I appreciate they’re trying), I’ve had MX Linux before, worked great, just a bit outdated, I moved my 32bit machine to Void Linux, it seems to have the best support yet ! I’m running cutting edge kernel and dev tools on that old fart

    • thejodie@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “32bit systems are a lot younger than 20 years”

      I don’t follow. The i386 is almost 40 years old now. Can you elaborate?

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ya, 64 bit was becoming more common/standard 16ish years ago with vista right? I remember I had to get vista even though I didn’t want to because it had support for 64 but.

  • tabularasa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chromebooks, if they fit into the use case, are fantastic. All day battery life, boot instantly, seamless migrations to a new device. I got one of these for my parents, grandparents, etc, and I’ll never look back.

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And windows works fine for most tech illiterate people who just need to use the web and type up word docs/use Excel. Most normal folks aren’t tech literate enough or have no reason to bother.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I replaced ChromeOS with Linux forever ago when they dropped support for my hardware. It would be a brick if not for Linux.

    • Hellfire103@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So does Android. It’s been torn apart and locked down so much, however, that it becomes a totally different OS.

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. Still is. Don’t kniw why you were downvoted. Maybe some people are confusing the ChromeOS base with Crostini (a Debian container)

  • Draconic NEO@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Unless you used Ubuntu 32 bit, then they’ll just drop you like a sack of potatoes, in that regard Canonical is no better than Google