And apparently, also when you think that āTheyā is a perfectly serviceable gender-neutral singular pronoun, but are willing to use other pronouns if asked to.
EDIT: Other removable offenses on Blahaj now include questioning mod/admin decisions and quoting the modlog as a reason why youāre leaving.
So now itās not āI told Ada how to run her instanceā, itās āMy comment was reportedā, glad to see weāre moving goalposts at lightning speed. Jesus H. Christ. Are you going to actually present any argument youāre willing to stand by, or just jump from point to unrelated point in the hopes of making yourself feel like you defended the tribe sufficiently?
Did you not fucking read the OP? Holy fucking shit. I didnāt realize saying āI guess Blahaj is now added to the list of instances I avoid when possible. Unfortunate.ā was such an aggressive crime in your eyes.
Oh, wait, of course I did, anything thatās not total agreement and bootlicking of your online community of choice is an attack against the basic dignity of everyone therein. I forgot I was back on Tumblr.
Again, demonstrating a below average reading comprehension.
Continuing from your summary:
This is not complex. I should not have had to repeat that fucking conversation to anyone over the age of eight, yet here we fucking are.
At no point have you engaged with reality here. You just have some sort of desired narrative that you want to cling to, and so you cling to it in the face of all evidence to the contrary. Hell, in the very post I just responded to you accused my posts of being removed for not being worded ānice enoughā, which doesnāt even vaguely fit the removals cited in the literal OP. Iām not sure if you canāt read it, didnāt read it, or are just too attached to your narrative to read it, but in any case, itās really rather pathetic, and quite in-line with what Iāve come to expect of you. Well-intentioned (in the sense of ādesiring a gentle resolutionā), but with very little understanding or capability of parsing arguments that donāt fit your axioms. The axiom youāre using here being, of course, āThe community I like is always right and I will always defend them regardless of the facts šā
In the course of this argument, you have ignored evidence provided entirely, deliberately cut off already very-short statements in order to provide an interpretation literally and directly contrary to its explicitly stated details, ignored contradictions when pointed out, and moved goalposts, and yet at no point do you appear to have anything even vaguely resembling self-awareness on any of it. This is either incredibly bad faith on your part, or an incredibly low level of competence, and in either case, youāve done nothing but waste time with your disingenuous arguments and outright falsehoods.
Oh, and no, doing so with a ānice toneā does not change any of that.
You created a space primed for harrassment, dude. Intentionally or not. Youāve seen the descent into bigotry comments sections like those go to? You made a live drama trap for more of the exact behavior admins have the unique goal of fighting to combat. You might as well have titled your sadpost āHey guys, hereās a space to do the harrassment this entire community is designed around avoiding also Iām leaving.ā
The mods arenāt obligated to host open honeypots like that, especially not from users self-admittedly on the way out. If it wasnāt intentional, I hope this helps clears things up! Cuz wow.
The fucking post wasnāt removed. The actual post was never fucking removed. Holy shit. Only a few of my comments were removed, for spurious reasons. Quite clearly itās not āThe comment section was going to get bad!ā, it was āAdminās feelings were hurt by critical comments that did not harass anyone, whereas the supposedly harassment-inviting post was left upā.
Oh, is that what āI donāt agree with this mod decision so Iām leavingā translates to to you?
What a bootlicking attitude.
Again, what you claim is the motivation flies directly in the face of the actual facts of the situation; namely, that the post itself wasnāt removed. Individual comments of mine were removed for spurious reasons. The post itself, the thing you claim is the motivation, the āhoneypotā that you think will in some way create harassment and the admins had to react to, was left up, and IS STILL UP, FOR FUCKāS SAKE.
Given that, it is quite clearly isnāt the reason, but itās equally clear that you have no actual interest in whatās happening. Iām sure youāll move the goalposts, ignore this point entirely, or just outright make shit up, just like you have at every other step in this argument.
comments can be honeypots tooā¦ i never said it was the post itself. you kind of moved the posts on me for that one.
This you?
God, I hate it when Iām fucking right.
ah, i apologize. i do admit that i used language there that slightly misrepresented my meaning, and i see your confusion. this inclarity is my fault.
i was using the term āsadpostā in reference to whatever content that was removed, whether comments or posts. i see that you interpreted the āpostā in sadpost to mean reddit-style top-level posts only, where my tendency is to interpret the āpostā to mean any content, i.e. the act of hitting āpost.ā
nevertheless my point stands. you created a space which attracts the very drama blahaj is founded around avoiding.
itās like you went into r/GirlsWithHugePussies (SFW š and very cute, itās clothed women holding big pet cats) and posted comments saying, āsorry yāall i have to leave because of the rule that you canāt comment about the womenās bodies.ā
So, letās go over this
So I ācreated spaceā, something not generally associated with comments, implicitly enabling ācomments sectionsā in the āsadpostā which might as well have had a ātitleā of (insert the title you made here) despite the fact that comments donāt have titles.
So you managed to use a whole hell of a lot of language implying that you meant a top-level post, and an argument centered around the space provided by a top-level post, but really what you meant were the comments. Wow! Itās amazing that you managed to accidentally use all that language in such a specific and logical way that fits with your previous arguments made, but suddenly you clarified that DEFINITELY wasnāt what you meant when it was called out that it makes no factual goddamn sense.
There are two places where my comments were. One, in the announcement by one of the mods of 196 bringing attention to the rule clarification. The rest, in a post citing the modlog that itself, was not removed.
In what possible fucking way were either of those ācreating spaceā for harassment? In the former, space is already created without the comment; in the latter, space is already created without the comment. If it was about creating the space for harassment to potentially occur, even assuming you were talking about my comments previously, how would that in any conceivable way reconcile with the fact that the post, a much bigger space for āharassmentā, was left up?
Your latest argument makes zero goddamn sense in light of the evidence, just like the rest.
Or if itās like I was posting to GirlsWithHugePussies for over a year with no problem, and then the INSTANCE of GirlsWithHugePussies clarifies that āDogs are pussies tooā. The comm of GirlsWithHugePussies mentions this, and when I comment to GirlsWithHugePussies āThatās unfortunate, I donāt have any desire to stick around guys/gals, sorryā, itās removed for āgatekeeping pussiesā.
And rather than dispute it, because ultimately I have neither power nor desire to influence the instanceās admins, I simply leave and bitch about my comments being removed for āgatekeepingā on a comm about bitching about moderator/admin actions.
Then a whole bunch of defenders of the instance come in and say, in this bitching thread on a bitching comm on and instance entirely separate from GirlsWithHugePussiesā instance, that Iām felinephobic for not acknowledging dogs as pussies, and one commenter in particular claims that I was acting āentitledā for daring to mention leaving in the process of leaving, claiming that my anodynely worded original comments were actually ānot niceā enough, and that if I wanted to avoid a removal, I shouldāve just worded them nicer, and that, furthermore, I was ācreating spaceā for harassment by saying farewell to a comm Iād been posting on for a long time whilst having any reaction to the rule clarification other than utter bootlicking sycophancy, since āItās not for me, I understand, but Iām leavingā was apparently too hostile.
That put it into perspective?
Doubtful, considering what lengths youāve went through to avoid any troubling thoughts in your head in the course of this conversation.
So you acknowledge that you left the community simply because the Admin said to
report and blockdisengage suspected trolling rather than engaging in harrassment? Thatās so sad :(No, not even close to what was said, and thatās very much the response I expected after seeing your behavior in this argument. Thereās nothing even vaguely resembling that in the comment youāre supposedly responding to. As usual, you ignore the evidence and arguments presented and make shit up.
Although I suppose I should thank you, since this reply clarifies that itās not incompetence, but explicitly bad faith youāre arguing in.