• i3c8XHV@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    The Palestinians can stop the war in Gaza any minute. They could have stopped it yesterday. They could end it tomorrow. They could wlend it this very minute.

    They could have had a Palestinian state. They could have a Palestinian state.

    This is the ultimate truth that leftist media is working so hard to hide: The Palestinians don’t want a Palestinian state. They want Israelis not to have one.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The general election will be a competition between two senile goons shouting “I love Israel more than you!” at one another from across a debate stage.

      Then we’ll all get an earful about how voting is a civic duty and you need to choose which one is the lesser of the two evils.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    But sure, yeah… go ahead and just not vote. Letting Trump in will be so much better for the Palestinians.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      A week ago, the difference between the two would have been that Trump would enable Israel in every way, while Biden would enable Israel in every way, but staffers would leak stories about how much Biden didn’t like Netanyahu from time to time. Now, Biden has started sending aid to Gaza while Harris is calling for a ceasefire, and this is entirely because 100K voters in Michigan voted uncommitted. When done properly, threatening to withhold your vote can be an effective way to make your voice heard.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, I’m not saying there’s been enough change, just that there has been some change, and it was brought on by people threatening to withhold their vote.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            it was brought on by people threatening to withhold their vote.

            Its definitely been a wake-up call to the party. Watching Biden shed 20% of Democratic voter turnout in a fucking primary is something. Obama and Clinton never had these kinds of problems in '12 and '96. And guys that did - Carter getting burned by Ted Kennedy in '80 and Bush to Buchanan in '92 - should have been a warning to the party as a whole.

            • pjwestin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah, I’ll be honest, I’m very worried about this election. I’m still unhappy with Biden’s approach to Israel, but at least now they can credibly argue that voting for him would be harm reduction for Palestinians. Maybe that will be enough to drive turnout.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                at least now they can credibly argue that voting for him would be harm reduction

                Right until the polls close in November, at which point its back to business as usual.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Letting Trump in

      Winner-take-all electoral college means you never really had a voice in the matter.

      You should have moved to a Blue State before 2020, so your physical presence could be used to tip how many electoral votes that state produced, if you really cared about stopping Trump in 2024. That’s the only consequential method of putting a (very tiny) finger on the scale of a Presidential contest.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          From a population perspective, it wouldn’t matter. Your best bet would be to find a bright blue state that is on the cusp of getting a new house seat. That would boost up the EC total for the state and guarantee consistent adds to Team Blue. Moving to a purple state and hoping you are THE swing voter mostly just means you make the state more valuable to invest in by the various campaigns. You’re still going to be functionally feeding Red Team during red election waves (which blue needs votes the most) when your view is most likely to be in the minority.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The irony of literally anyone (eligible) not voting for Biden specifically because of his handling of the Gaza situation, and thereby doing their part to help Donald “Gotta Finish the Problem” Trump win, makes my bones hurt. I hate this timeline and I don’t want to live on this planet anymore.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The irony of literally anyone (eligible) not voting for Biden specifically because of his handling of the Gaza situation

      I left my primary ballot blank. There was nobody on the ticket who wasn’t going to continue the genocide (with perhaps Marianna Williamson as an exception, but I’m not indulging her vanity campaign). Come November, I suspect I’ll be in the same spot. Two candidates who are endorsing genocide, with the caveat that one is waving an Israeli sports pennant while the other repeatedly insists he feels really bad about it.

      I hate this timeline and I don’t want to live on this planet anymore.

      Swing by Gaza. We’ll sell the Israelis the next round of ammo used to wipe you off the face of the Earth.

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s a good thing that the only responsibility of a US president is deciding what to do about Israel.

        If they were the only person able to veto something like a national abortion ban, or legislation criminalizing trans people, it would really mess with your calculus.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s a good thing that the only responsibility of a US president is deciding what to do about Israel.

          Hey now, that’s not true. He’s also responsible for getting his Too Woke judicial nominees filibustered, appointing a bunch of corporate flacks to the Federal Reserve, doing photo ops at the US-Mexico border while wearing tacti-cool kit and frowning through a pair of binoculars, and fucking up the handling of the next environmental / weather disaster. And who can forget the most important job of any President? Fundraising!

          If they were the only person able to veto something like a national abortion ban

          Then we’re already fucked, because that would imply all this hemming and hawing about abortion being a losing issue for Republicans failed to pan out and now a bunch of sadistic right-wing fucks are crowding into the House and Senate.