(inspired by friends’ dating app woes)

  • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s all of a kind to me whether someone is into crystals or crucifixes. Honestly, I prefer the crystals folks. They’re less likely to actively and vocally prefer my non-existence. But to be honest, I really don’t see a difference between casting a spell to get a job and praying to jesus to get a job. The more it becomes a major focus of one’s existence, the more problematic it is, but I suspect that both numerically and by percentage, there are fewer fundamentalists on the witchy side.

      • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a fair point, although I do think they ceded first place in the past couple of years. Unvaccinated adults are now three times more likely to be republican than not. They’re not only numerically outnumbering the new agers, they’re anti-vaxxing from the halls of government and via mass media, as opposed to facebook moms in suburban california who also sell essential oils.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d also consider myself a humanist. While I’d prefer to not use such condescending language, that’s nearly exactly how I look at it. Wicca and Paganism are religions like any other in regards to spiritualism, and can be subject to the same types of fanaticism. Personally, I really like Wiccans and Pagans. I vibe well with their leftist tendencies

      • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe my gauge is calibrated differently, but I wasn’t trying to be condescending. At most, I thought a christian might consider it condescending because their mainstream religion was being compared to a fashionable new age fancy at best.

        Christians - some of them - think that the existence of Aquinas means that their religion is intellectual at its core, wh i in their minds renders paganism mere cosplay. I’ve had exactly that argument made to me.

        In any case, that was just a benign musing. When I condescend to condescend, it’s ridiculously obvious. Apologies for any offense - it was friendly fire.

        • Harrison [He/Him]@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is paganism not just cosplay? There’s no continuity of tradition for pagan religions, they just picked it up because it was cool a few decades ago.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The ones I interacted with seemed more to the right in my opinion, but maybe I am too far left already?

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They tend towards the left, but that’s not always the case for every individual. The ones I know are anti-capitalist, but I’m positive that there are liberal Pagans too