That’s how the minimum age for purchasing tobacco used to work in the US; if states wanted a specific chunk of federal funding, their minimum age had to be set to at least 18.
From the fonts I’d guess NYT
Edit: other comments are saying Washington Post
I don’t think your last sentence is congruent with what you were saying before it.
You’re saying a CEO will opt for conglomeration because it either increases the value or decreases the volatility of the company because the CEO has lots of stock in the company. If that’s the case, how is it bad for the shareholders, of which the CEO is a major player?
The Behind the Bastards podcast covered Jack Welch, definitely worth a listen.