• 0 Posts
  • 242 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 29th, 2023

help-circle











  • Very annoying - the apparent author of the backdoor was in communication with me over several weeks trying to get xz 5.6.x added to Fedora 40 & 41 because of it’s “great new features”. We even worked with him to fix the valgrind issue (which it turns out now was caused by the backdoor he had added). We had to race last night to fix the problem after an inadvertent break of the embargo.

    He has been part of the xz project for 2 years, adding all sorts of binary test files, and to be honest with this level of sophistication I would be suspicious of even older versions of xz until proven otherwise.

    Damn. I would love to see a full post mortem on this compromise.


  • Fair point. I am actually concerned about just bouncing around aimlessly when I retire. I know that will not go well.

    What you’re talking about sounds like what I had in mind. Structure for at least part of the day. Every day.

    I also need to have specific goals laid out. I’m starting to make a master list of post retirement goals. I imagine having one big long term project and a few short term ones would work as long as I keep to a rough timeline on each.

    Back when I had a better work schedule I usually had one or two small projects or else one big project going at any time and was able to stick to them.

    I’m also thinking that taking a class or doing a part time job (or volunteering) would be a good idea. And another option is switch to part time at my current job. I know a few who have.




  • What the saying is trying to convey:

    Sometimes people focus on a few small details of some problem to such a great degree that they completely fail to consider the larger context and purpose.

    It isn’t trying to say details are unimportant. Only that the larger context matters and should be considered while investigating the details of a problem.

    I am trying to think of a good example. The one I found online is something like, “the senator was so focused on the wording of one subsection of the bill he didn’t stop to consider the bill was too unpopular to ever pass regardless of the wording”.

    Ok how about this. Let’s say a company is to unify access control across disparate systems. The overarching goal is to be able to set policy in one place not in each individual application.

    A team is in the process of evaluating a candidate product. They want to complete the evaluation in a set time frame and focus on a particular scenario (web app, specific tech stack) for a proof of concept that isn’t representative of many of the typical scenarios in the company (web, database, API, etc).

    The team spends their time focused on getting the evaluation done and discovers the product doesn’t integrate as well as originally expected with a key system. They focus on coming up with a solution so they can complete the proof of concept.

    They consider their efforts a success when they finish up the eval on time.

    But the evaluation wasn’t useful because it didn’t really consider the overarching project goals and in the end the solution didn’t even meet those goals!

    Hope this helps.