If it’s a spot the difference style thing then the art won’t be dramatically different and you still get to have the box art at least.
If it’s a spot the difference style thing then the art won’t be dramatically different and you still get to have the box art at least.
This just provides a small added challenge, I don’t really see an issue . If you want an easier jigsaw they might sell them at a toy store.
Pretty sure it’s the fault of the scary awful side for being scary and awful.
Multi-track drifting. Also while some infinities are smaller if you’re just counting out an infinite number of individual humans then I’m pretty sure they’re the same size infinities one is just social distancing. Smaller infinities are ones like those in between each part of the bigger infinities. To represent a smaller infinity you’d maybe have to have an infinite number of smaller humans crammed into a spot the size of one of the spaces between the humans on the other track, or something along those lines. The real number track does contain smaller infinities between each integer via infinite decimal points but I don’t think one track would technically be smaller than the other in this case since they run parallel to each other but neither are technically limited in the “length” of their infinity so to speak. But I could be misremembering how they classify smaller infinities.
Fucking idiots, trying to act like the chatbot wasn’t their responsibility.
Wtf, as a Canadian who had a breast reduction and a revision for free this sort of thing seems like a nightmare to me.
I don’t look at other people as if they are or were me, I look at them as if they are their own people who may or may not be living their life differently from me.
I’m pretty sure there’s not a single person on the planet who expected them to be equally critical of both.
I wasn’t raised by an iPad I grew up playing outside, I still have this issue. It’s the adhd in our case, hence why it’s posted in the adhd community.
Body image and psychological stuff still fall under societal influence rather than biological influence, and the hormones we produce are fundamentally a sex thing, not a gender thing.
Something being a social construct doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a tangible influence on how people feel, it just means that it isn’t based on intrinsic biological fact. What constitutes being a “man” or a “woman” differs between cultures and between people, it is often tied to biology because of societal expectations and association, but it doesn’t actually come from biology. Something like pink being a girl’s colour or women wearing makeup or men drinking beers instead of daquiris, those are all arbitrary performances people put on based on what society tells them men or women should do. Even the pronouns he/she were invented, some languages don’t have gendered pronouns by default like English does. None of that comes from biology, biology doesn’t tell us what pronouns we use or what we should wear.
Skeletal differences are related to sex not gender.
As far as I’m aware gravity doesn’t directly act on portals so I don’t think they would experience acceleration from Gravity themselves. Though I was thinking about it more in terms of general relativity rather than Newtonian gravity.
Worm Jesus is about to be crucified.
They can move at a constant speed in a constant direction, but the acceleration would break them.
Theoretically you can if they’re moving in a constant direction at a constant speed a la an inertial frame.
Okay? Nobody said you had to care.
Those products all lump themselves together under the term “organic”, that’s the problem.
I did do my research. There’s no evidence of any health benefit from eating organic foods and the environmental benefit is relatively minor depending on the country and ultimately no more effective (often less effective) than other dietary lifestyle changes like vegetarianism or veganism or even just reducing the amount of meat you eat. Depending on how the word organic is used on the packaging it could mean the food contains anywhere from 50-90% “organic” products. The USDA rating only accounts for the standards of one country, not the whole world, not to mention even the USDA rating doesn’t exclude all fertilizers or all GMO products, but organic stuff is commonly described and marketed as being “pesticide and GMO free food”. “Organic” food is constantly marketed and viewed as being healthier despite there being no actual evidence supporting that. None of that contradicts what I said in my first comment. It is an arbitrary and abused term that doesn’t actually tell you anything about the food reliably. I’m not saying it’s completely meaningless entirely I’m just saying it has little meaning, certainly much less than most people believe, due to a lack of consistency, constant lies in marketing, and the low level of impact it has on the environment compared to other comparable dietary options. You also don’t even need to buy stuff labeled as organic in order to eat organic, since lots of organic foods aren’t labelled.
By all means I would love more strict wide-spread regulation and enforcement of the term “organic” based around maximizing its environmental impact, but at the moment it’s little more than a marketing tool for most companies.
Stuff like this is part of why I dropped out of multimedia production in college, I only enjoy that stuff as a hobby for myself, doing it for other people is a creative nightmare lol