The sheer aptitude they had for ignoring information is commendable
They should become a politician
The sheer aptitude they had for ignoring information is commendable
They should become a politician
I knew a guy when we were both in final year of a biomed bachelor. He was a creationist
Don’t know how he went that long without finding something that challenges that viewpoint
These kinds of charts are usually used to compare things that, in this case, wouldn’t be science, but humourously could be considered science if given a chance
But the other guy is right-if you don’t follow the scientific method and don’t try to describe your findings in ways that attempt to better understand the universe, then that’s not science. That’s bias
I don’t know why, but my danger sense is off the charts rn
While that’s correct and all, it still irks me when somebody uses a word that has a shorter, older variant. (Gives side-eye to orientated)
Damn bro, I’m going to have to start using it then
…no it’s not?
Edit: yes it is
If you want a good front end alternative to youtube, try freetube on pcs and newpipe on android
I feel like the only person in the world who dislikes oreos
After Ublock, its easily my favourite addon
I mean, I’d prefer to use antibiotics in more important situations, especially when a yearly jab does the job perfectly well
I’d add more information, but I’ve forgotten it all
My respect for pearl oyster mushrooms just went up by 50%
I always roll my eyes whenever I see a “you can’t do that because you’re a woman” character in a show, and then I’m always reminded that these people actually exist
I agree that English is a constantly changing language, with many words meaning the same thing or single words meaning multiple different things. It’s the case with the male man, derived from werman, as is such with many other words
But your point ignores what I was trying to say
Anybody who feels the need to specify gender with such limited information is simply being sexist. Neither male nor female should be assumed in this instance
This goes for people other than those in the post; scholars and students should be held accountable alike
Whether these historic individuals were male or female is irrelevant. Only their creations truly matter
I’m confused by this quote - no sane person would assume a male did something just because we say man did it. In this instance, man would simply be referencing humanity
The want to define whether a male or female did it without any evidence is simply sexist
Did I hear a rock and stone?
I’m not
I mean, I’m in a medical course so… yes it does matter that students understand a fundamental concept all life is based on?