ah, that makes sense!

yeah same here, just a hickup it seems.

If you don’t think the question deserves an answer, then just don’t. There’s no point in being a dick about it.

You both are right, and wrong. This, annoyingly, varies by location.

Stålmannen går på en krypto-nit

US law is an interesting response to an ethics question

The problem with only counting calories for health has never been more aptly highlighted!

as does the same amount of any other substance, including for example yoghurt.

That number is just the E in E=mc²

If we are actually talking dietary calories, the number you see on foodstuff packaging, plutonium has 0.

when comparing to kg I will assume the mass unit, since comparing a mass value to a force has no meaning.

when compared to a value in Kg, the only logical interpretation is the mass pound. If it were lbf, the si unit conversion would be Newtons.

Having the same name for two different, but easily mixed up units is really annoying haha

deleted by creator

The bar is defined to be close to the atmospheric pressure of one random planet called earth, why choose that as your pressure unit?

isn’t that lbf?

The pund itself is defined as 0.45359237 Kg

huh?

Mass doesnt change with gravity

its just “washed up” shortened

I am more scared of the horseless headsman

None of those things describe a good programmer

Like, privacy and security fears that doesn’t exist with western cars, …right?

yes they do, but not as a useful, well defined category in biology.