JD Vance, no fan of gender-neutral bathrooms, was photographed in his high school yearbook next to three girls posing in front of urinals in a bathroom during his senior year.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    For what it’s worth, I have to agree with you. I guess people forget that kids do stupid shit in high school, and this photo isn’t really that stupid. Now if this was a photo of Vance organizing a right-wing group in high school, that might be noteworthy.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      So it’s fine for teenage girls to go into the boys bathroom because “teens will be teens” but it isn’t ok for trans boys to go to boys bathrooms because… why, exactly?

      Like how are you not seeing the blatant hypocrisy between this action and the rhetoric he spews?

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        So it’s fine for teenage girls to go into the boys bathroom because “teens will be teens” but it isn’t ok for trans boys to go to boys bathrooms because… why, exactly?

        You’re making a lot of assumptions here; correlation does not mean causation. You don’t know of the circumstances behind the photo. You only know that there are girls in a men’s bathroom and Vance happens to be in the photo.

        I never said in any way shape or form that it wasn’t okay for transgender people to use their respective bathrooms. I sure as Hell have never defended Vance’s stances. But if you want to go putting words in my mouth because it fits your narrative, you go right ahead. But know this if you do: that makes you no better than them.

        Like how are you not seeing the blatant hypocrisy between this action and the rhetoric he spews?

        Honestly, if you want to rip on Vance for the things he’s done, it’s probably wise to choose more relevant situations to criticize him for; not some picture from high school that he was a part of simply because the student body president (not him) wanted to make a joke about the patriarchy of the time.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m making assumptions? I’m putting words in your mouth when the only thing I’ve done is criticize JD Vance?

          Good god, sea lions are fucking exhausting. Very weird.

    • davidagain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Under his proposed law, these girls would be guilty of a crime and would be sex offenders for using a bathroom that doesn’t match their birth sex. The fact that it’s in a school makes it “worse”.

      You might say that’s unreasonable, but the unreasonable thing is the law, not the kids.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I don’t know what these psychopaths have to do before people like this (not you if that wasn’t clear) listen to what they’re saying. It’s unbelievable. Vance openly supports legislation that would literally make these girls criminals, period.

        They’re telling us who they are, and exactly what they will do. Please listen.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Under his proposed law, these girls would be guilty of a crime and would be sex offenders for using a bathroom that doesn’t match their birth sex. The fact that it’s in a school makes it “worse”.

        Yes, he’s a hypocritical misogynist, and he’s obviously an opportunist who will do and say whatever it takes to appeal to his base — even if it means throwing his wife under the bus with blatant racism. You’ll get no argument from me about that. But this photo is not the smoking gun everyone seems to be making it out to be. There is nothing revolutionary about it at all. It’s not even his photo. He just happens to be in it.

        You might say that’s unreasonable, but the unreasonable thing is the law, not the kids.

        Get upset for the right reasons. This photo isn’t one of them.