• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    Second worst has always been the winner throughout American history.

    You may think that Trump was second worst to Clinton, but I don’t.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Definitely unsurprising. Irrationality definitely doesn’t appear to be against your modus operandi when it comes to these topics.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        If second worst always wins and Trump beat Clinton, you’re saying that Trump was second worst to Clinton.

        As always with centrists, abuse is what you use in lieu of defensible positions.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Oh I see you back to making strawman and calling names again? Is that really all you have. Just so you know that’s rhetorical question.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                I already replied to you. You made the idiotic assertion that second worst always wins. I countered it by saying that Trump won in 2016 and wasn’t second worst.

                Since you can’t take being called out on being so obviously wrong about this, you did the only thing any centrist ever does when they’re wrong: start slinging abuse.

                • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Do you haven’t posted an actual serious reply to any response I make you in this whole chain. Not just that one. But it was obvious that that when you were not replying in good faith. Which is your modus operandi. All you can do is call me wine and split hair in order to find any technical out.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    You said something provably false and evidently expect me to immediately and unquestioningly accept it as incontrovertible fact. You can’t admit you’re wrong.

                    Do you haven’t posted an actual serious reply to any response I make you in this whole chain.

                    The only thing you accept as serious is agreeing with you about everything. Or maybe being to the right of you.