United States Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein is considering three Palestinian rights advocates, including two Arab Americans, to be her running mate in the elections, her campaign has confirmed.

The vice president announcement will be made during a livestream rally on Thursday, the Stein campaign told Al Jazeera.

The candidates are Abed Ayoub, executive director at the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC); Amer Zahr, a Palestinian American activist; and Jacqueline Luqman, a journalist and activist.

All three have been vocal critics of Israel and the US’s unflinching support for the war on Gaza. Stein, a physician and activist, herself is a longtime supporter of Palestinian rights.

Having one of the three on the ballot could boost Stein’s chances of tapping into the mass of disaffected voters who have grown angry with the mainstream Democratic Party’s stance on Israel.

  • kevindqc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You misspelled Russian puppet.

    Also thinking that democrats voting third-party will do anything other than help Trump, who wants Israel to go all the way and wants to crackdown on pro-palestine protests… is pure delusion.

    You would think someone who posts almost exclusively about Israel would know that 🤷‍♂️

    • paf0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      What evidence is there of this? I won’t vote for her but she has been around for years and seems well intentioned.

      • EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Running as a hopeless spoiler candidate designed to draw votes away from the left is not a well intentioned course.

        • paf0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I disagree, it’s a naive course, but I do believe that people who run for and support third parties are generally well intentioned.

          • EvilBit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            I think Jill Stein is entirely too suspicious to be considered a good faith third party. Others have provided evidence. You can attribute good intentions all you want, but it’s irresponsible to be blind to the impact at best, or simply inexcusable to bring it about at worst.

            • paf0@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m not a huge fan of her or anything but I do firmly believe that third parties should exist. I’ve been aware of Stein for a long time and thought she just seemed like a simple environmentalist. I have only recently become aware of the allegations of her working with Russia and I can’t tell from what I have read if it’s legit or not, or if it’s just Democrats trying to turn people against her. Regardless, I will not be voting for her.

              • EvilBit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Independently, yes, I support the concept of a third party. If we can institute ranked choice voting or some other system, bring it on. Until then though, it’s just unrealistic and dangerous.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        She’s a fucking wackjob who thought 911 was an inside job. That’s not even the only reason she is a wackjob.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nothing liberals are just making up crazy conspiracy theories while ignoring the direct line between israel and the Democrats.