I think it’s fair that programmatic and human readable can be different. If someone is putting in the month word for a logging system they can fuck right off though
As long as they use letter for months, like Jul 09, 2013 its fine. Otherwise prefer a sorted timescale version. Either slow changing to fast changing yyyy mm dd or fast to slow dd mm yyyy.
Christ, do this many people really find iso8601 hard to read? It’s the date and the time with a T in the middle.
I think it’s fair that programmatic and human readable can be different. If someone is putting in the month word for a logging system they can fuck right off though
That way you can sort the months of the year, in order:
I use it all the time when writing dates.
2023-08-09: just read from the end. 9th August 2023.
As long as they use letter for months, like Jul 09, 2013 its fine. Otherwise prefer a sorted timescale version. Either slow changing to fast changing yyyy mm dd or fast to slow dd mm yyyy.
Nah, letters bring another complexity - besides with them Feb gets sorted after Dec.
what