• Killing_Spark@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I never understood why booting arm is such a pain. I mean I get that the current situation is that it is a pain but I don’t get why this is the situation.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Mobile devices usually run iOS or Android which have their own dedicated boot loader. Embedded devices usually just boot directly into the main storage.

      • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Especially with android I don’t get it. Every vendor has to maintain their own boot loader and modify the aosp code just to get it to boot on their devices. Is it just to avoid people slapping their own os on their phones?

    • Balder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think UEFI was something that took a while to be standardized and mostly because of Intel’s influence over it, while ARM seems more diverse both in manufacturers and types of devices. When things are decentralized it becomes much more difficult to get everyone on board of something.

      • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I guess but bios was a thing way before uefi and while it apparently also was a pain because people implemented it differently it did work.

        Afaik the mein problem with arm is the discoverability of the hardware on the bus. For x86 it’s pretty dynamic but arm needs something called a device tree.