PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 6 months agoThe easiest problemdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1582file-text
arrow-up1567imageThe easiest problemdiscuss.tchncs.dePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 6 months agomessage-square90fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDarkSurferZA@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28·6 months agoGotten even easier after X became a registered trademark. Now the only choice we have left is i. Or ii if you need more variables
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·6 months ago“j” is what you’re supposed to use if you need another index variable after using “i”.
minus-squareBougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 months agoOkay, say you’ve got four inner loops (a crime on its own, I know), do you use i, j, k, l or i, j, k, ii?
Gotten even easier after X became a registered trademark. Now the only choice we have left is i. Or ii if you need more variables
“j” is what you’re supposed to use if you need another index variable after using “i”.
Okay, say you’ve got four inner loops (a crime on its own, I know), do you use i, j, k, l or i, j, k, ii?
lIIl, IIIl, lIlI and IllI
This is the way