• EmbeddedEntropy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    They are violating section 6 of the GPLv2 by adding further restrictions.

    But ignoring that, I haven’t heard anyone discussing what could happen once this anti-GPL angle goes beyond Red Hat. What’s going to happen once internet connected IoT devices or say a company like Tesla pull the same technique. If Tesla kills your account for any reason, you lose all your paid for services and your car becomes a brick.

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      What further restrictions are they making? You are free to do whatever you want with the source code provided for the binaries they distributed to you.

      • EmbeddedEntropy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, I am no “free” to do whatever I want. I want to distribute that source is strictly allowed under the GPL, but then RH penalizes me for exercising that right by terminating that account. That’s a restriction. How is being penalized for doing what I’m allowed to do not a restriction?

        How about yet another angle for you. For example, I download and distribute the source RPM for gcc for the version running on my box. RH terminates my account. Now I want to download and distribute the source RPM for the kernel running on my box. How do I do that with a terminated account?