• Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Actually “rationalising the pipeline” would be getting rid of all the massively overpaid execs, rather than the people who actually make the Take-Two execs their money

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Absolutely sickening. Yeah, we can’t afford you people actually doing the money making and Jeremy’s new yacht. It was a tough decision, i swear

    • Bilb!@lem.monster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      People always say this, but the execs and board members making obscene money for doing as little a possible is the whole point of the endeavor.

    • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not defending corporations but these massive conglomerates usually get so intricate, so messy, that there are people who end up getting a paycheck that genuinely do not get assignments. In other words, getting paid to watch paint dry. So sometimes the comments that look terrible are directed at people who were doing nothing or very nearly nothing and still getting paid for it.

      But yes also fuck executives getting x80 the pay of developers.

  • Blackout@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    This company literally prints money but it’s not good enough without the human suffering.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yay capitalism. The pursuit of infinite quarterly profit will fuck and enshitify everything we’ve ever known.

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Whatever happened to “We’re firing people because we realised we can do the job with fewer workers so we want to save money”?

    At least then it’s honest.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Honest would be “We’re firing people to make our short term profits look better. That’s what my bonuses are based on, after all!”.

  • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Fat trim” is the other one I recently heard, and it’s absolutely the worst one I’ve heard so far. Glad they consider humans working their best as “fat”…

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      They only made $1.45 billion last year, just up 56% year-over-year.

      They were expecting to make over two billion. Which from the perspective of an American corporation, means they lost half a billion dollars. So the end of year bonuses for the c suites are only half as much as they were anticipating, which from the perspective of American executives is like they lost hundreds of thousands of dollars this year.

      So you see, it makes perfect sense why hundreds to thousands of employees must be laid off. The business is in a dire position!

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Losing their jobs through no fault of their own, mind you. Disgusting behaviour by Take-Two just to line their shareholders pockets.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is business as usual for Rockstar development. Historically they wait until right after they ship, though.