• scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, but when things go wrong, the boom is relatively small and contained.

      We can’t run a regular coal or natural gas power plant here without fucking it up and getting people killed. Despite the safety of modern plant designs, I do NOT trust the people in charge here with fissile material.

      • Strykker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Go lookup CANDU reactors, we have designs already that can’t steam explode themselves and instead will fail safe. Also just to be clear nuclear reactors don’t perform a nuclear explosion if they fail, the Chernobyl explosion was a steam explosion that threw nuclear material into the air.

        • scoobford@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The level of incompetence I’ve grown to expect of my state government would suggest that they’d have fissile material delivered and stored in a leaky shed, where it will create runoff which contaminates the local reservoir, before a crackhead steals it, takes it to the scrapyard, and it is never seen again.

        • Sizzler@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Or we could just use solar with none of those risks but still using the largest nuclear reaction around.

      • Michal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s why people prefer driving over flying, right? If something goes wrong, the boom is small and contained.

        Never mind that planes are much safer and efficient at travelling long distance.