This study compares two websites with similar design: the commercial Spotlight template from developers of Tailwind vs the same site with semantic CSS.

  • FlumPHP@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    But you didn’t use the word normal / plain / vanilla. You used proper, which is a loaded word.

      • shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        You could just as easily use the article’s title and save your opinions for the post body or the comments, but you didn’t.

        Oh no, implicit bias. Twice!

      • Kayn@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Please just use the original title. Semantic CSS is an actual thing and it takes 2 seconds to google what it is.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        That guy just pulled the same “misinterpret what you said, pretend it was your fuckup instead of my own overeager interpretation problem” to me here: https://lemm.ee/comment/10695316

        Your use of the word “proper” was … proper as a matter of fact. This guy’s just an idiot who enjoys adding a confounding interpretation with his own distorting commentary.