Jack Smith is not playing around.

    • Thugosaurus_Rex@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The takeaway here is that he’s actually received a Target Letter, which indicates a strong belief that there is substantial evidence against him and that criminal charges are being seriously considered. It’s a procedural step, and one that many people likely inferred, but it is important and shows a concrete stance on the investigation. It’s worth noting that “Target” is a specifically defined legal term in this context, on relevant part:

      A “target” is a person as to whom the prosecutor or the grand jury has substantial evidence linking him or her to the commission of a crime and who, in the judgment of the prosecutor, is a putative defendant…

      USAM 9-11.151

      • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The hed construction is nonetheless really weird. “Claims” is a pretty standard Trump-hed verb, but it’s inappropriate here. Throwing “target” in quotes additionally serves to cast doubt on a very straightforward piece of news.

  • knokelmaat@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The family of the 4 people that died on Jan. 6 were also given “HORRIFYING NEWS” that day.

    • lagomorphlecture@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, typically the criminal who is suspected of committing the crime is the target of the investigation. That’s definitely how it works, Donny. Good job.

  • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the same way the criminals are the “target” on investigations into their crimes, right? Like, technically true, but missing an awful lot of pertinent facts.