I think answering “yes” would have worked just fine.
The letter from the students said of the Oct 7 massacre:
“Today’s events did not occur in a vacuum… The apartheid regime is the only one to blame.”
Not exactly “calling for” genocide, and yes, it did not occur in a vacuum but “the only one to blame”? Really? That is support for a genocidal act IMO.
Admittedly that BBC article does cite a good response from Gay albeit a few days later.
So we’ve gone from the students were literally screaming for genocide, to OK so they were expressing how they think Israel brought this on themselves, which is like basically calling for genocide. That’s moving the goal post 3 towns over.
Disagree with their statement all you like, the students were not calling for violence, let alone genocide. The school should not take action against them. Future employers is probably going to be a different thing though.
Do you at least see that “Is calling for the genocide of Jews harassment and against university policy?” a loaded question now? Because the premise is 100% false.
Calling for genocide vs supporting genocide is not “moving the goalposts three towns over”. Aren’t we trying to eliminate hyperbole here?
It is however a nuanced difference Gay should have articulated in Congress. Maybe she did. Is there full video footage? I only found the snippet.
Having seen Gay’s belated but reasonable response printed by BBC I don’t think she should have been fired over that.
I can see the Congress question was loaded and the Senator is also responsible for the unfortunate messaging resulting in Gay’s dumb “it depends” response.
“Yes” was indeed the correct answer but she blew it by sticking to instructions which no doubt a lawyer had given her. She could have clarified after the “yes”. All three being questioned were not up to the task.
I have no stance on the allegations of plagiarism.
They did neither. Saying the conduct of Israel over the past few decades resulted in the attack is a gross over simplification of the situation, but it is not supporting the attack. Just like saying the ‘house burned down because the owner left oily rags next to the furnace’ is not celebrating the house burning down. It’s a statement on what they believe led up to the house burning down, correct, or incorrect.
It is however a nuanced difference Gay should have articulated in Congress. Maybe she did. Is there full video footage? I only found the snippet.
I haven’t seen the full video either. It may exist, but I’m pretty sure it was not released (google is crap these days, it’s only giving me stuff about her recent resignation). This was a right wing hit job. Releasing snippets, rather than the entire thing is by design. Even if she did have a a good response, it won’t be released in time. All we get is the gotcha loaded questions of her looking sympathetic to genocide.
Having now seen Gay’s belated but reasonable response printed by BBC I don’t think she should have been fired over the Gaza issue.
And that’s the point of the gotcha loaded questions. They get released, the public gets angry, before the situation can be properly explained. I think it’s very likely that a democrat questioned her too and she was able to give a good response, but since the republicans are in control of the house that didn’t make it out. This may be the cause of the belated response, thinking the entire thing would come out.
Harvard probably got a TON of donors calling saying they would withdraw support if she didn’t leave. And she did what most goodhearted people would do, resign to minimize the damage to the college that she cares about.
Even a “wife beater” can appreciate your points. However, if you will allow me to nitpick…
Saying the conduct of Israel over the past few decades resulted in the attack is a gross over simplification of the situation, but it is not supporting the attack.
The statement was: “hold the Israeli regime entirely responsible for all unfolding violence”.
And those kind of public statements were a gift for Likud who love escalation and now are making statements of their own (even less ambiguous) in favour of genocide.
The Western left wing got played by Hamas and Likud are now making the most of it.
Here in Australia the Green Party members of parliament (whom I otherwise support) walked out when the ruling party refused to sign a letter calling for Gazan peace. However the reason they didn’t sign is because the letter omitted any mention of Oct 7. Played.
Even a “wife beater” can appreciate your points. However, if you will allow me to nitpick…
I hope you know I wasn’t actually accusing you of being a wife beater. I thought it was the quintessential example of a loaded question and everyone knew of it… and would spark discussion about loaded questions. And how no matter what the response is, there’s an inflammatory headline that can be drawn from it that will squeak by a court of law. Apparently 1 mod didn’t know the reference.
The statement was: “hold the Israeli regime entirely responsible for all unfolding violence”.
I know, but it’s still not supporting genocide, or the violence in general.
And those kind of public statements were a gift for Likud who love escalation and now are making statements of their own (even less ambiguous) in favour of genocide.
Absolutely, they’re taking what was said out of context and turning it into propaganda.
The Western left wing got played by Hamas and Likud are now making the most of it.
Yup. Some of the blame rests with the American right wing too. Instead of trying to diffuse the situation, they poured fuel on the fire. They’re looking for any way to damage the left and don’t care about the cost. Instead of calling the statement insensitive victim blaming, and trying to calm things down, they lied to boost themselves and hurt others. This would not be propaganda for Hamas or Likud without the American right wing’s assistance.
I reported you to the mod. It seemed to be the kind of thing I was escaping Reddit from. Am glad to hear you were not being an asshole. Certainly your reasonable tone later had me confused so I am glad I mentioned it.
I think we agree the right wing is getting the upper hand and out of hand despite public sympathy for Palestinian civilians.
Some of them probably are hypocritically subscribing to the “Elders of Zion” hoax while jumping on anything remotely anti-semitic from the Left.
I do worry about a rise of anti-Semitism whether from the Left or the Right. I don’t think Germans were genetically evil and that it could not be repeated. The thirst for scapegoating is insatiable. Jews are the eternal go-to scapegoat and so I keep raising my voice amongst fellow left wingers to ensure we don’t feed that.
I reported you to the mod. It seemed to be the kind of thing I was escaping Reddit from. Am glad to hear you were not being an asshole. Certainly your reasonable tone later had me confused so I am glad I mentioned it.
No worries, I guess it’s not as common as I think. I did talk with one of the other mods this morning and they understood what I was aiming for and didn’t think it should have been removed.
I think we agree the right wing is getting the upper hand and out of hand despite public sympathy for Palestinian civilians.
We do.
Some of them probably are hypocritically subscribing to the “Elders of Zion” hoax while jumping on anything remotely anti-semitic from the Left.
Boggles my mind.
I do worry about a rise of anti-Semitism whether from the Left or the Right.
Me too. Any kinda of ‘out-grouping or othering’ for that matter.
I think answering “yes” would have worked just fine.
The letter from the students said of the Oct 7 massacre: “Today’s events did not occur in a vacuum… The apartheid regime is the only one to blame.”
Not exactly “calling for” genocide, and yes, it did not occur in a vacuum but “the only one to blame”? Really? That is support for a genocidal act IMO.
Admittedly that BBC article does cite a good response from Gay albeit a few days later.
lol, what?
So we’ve gone from the students were literally screaming for genocide, to OK so they were expressing how they think Israel brought this on themselves, which is like basically calling for genocide. That’s moving the goal post 3 towns over.
Disagree with their statement all you like, the students were not calling for violence, let alone genocide. The school should not take action against them. Future employers is probably going to be a different thing though.
Do you at least see that “Is calling for the genocide of Jews harassment and against university policy?” a loaded question now? Because the premise is 100% false.
Calling for genocide vs supporting genocide is not “moving the goalposts three towns over”. Aren’t we trying to eliminate hyperbole here?
It is however a nuanced difference Gay should have articulated in Congress. Maybe she did. Is there full video footage? I only found the snippet.
Having seen Gay’s belated but reasonable response printed by BBC I don’t think she should have been fired over that.
I can see the Congress question was loaded and the Senator is also responsible for the unfortunate messaging resulting in Gay’s dumb “it depends” response.
“Yes” was indeed the correct answer but she blew it by sticking to instructions which no doubt a lawyer had given her. She could have clarified after the “yes”. All three being questioned were not up to the task.
I have no stance on the allegations of plagiarism.
They did neither. Saying the conduct of Israel over the past few decades resulted in the attack is a gross over simplification of the situation, but it is not supporting the attack. Just like saying the ‘house burned down because the owner left oily rags next to the furnace’ is not celebrating the house burning down. It’s a statement on what they believe led up to the house burning down, correct, or incorrect.
I haven’t seen the full video either. It may exist, but I’m pretty sure it was not released (google is crap these days, it’s only giving me stuff about her recent resignation). This was a right wing hit job. Releasing snippets, rather than the entire thing is by design. Even if she did have a a good response, it won’t be released in time. All we get is the gotcha loaded questions of her looking sympathetic to genocide.
And that’s the point of the gotcha loaded questions. They get released, the public gets angry, before the situation can be properly explained. I think it’s very likely that a democrat questioned her too and she was able to give a good response, but since the republicans are in control of the house that didn’t make it out. This may be the cause of the belated response, thinking the entire thing would come out. Harvard probably got a TON of donors calling saying they would withdraw support if she didn’t leave. And she did what most goodhearted people would do, resign to minimize the damage to the college that she cares about.
Even a “wife beater” can appreciate your points. However, if you will allow me to nitpick…
The statement was: “hold the Israeli regime entirely responsible for all unfolding violence”.
And those kind of public statements were a gift for Likud who love escalation and now are making statements of their own (even less ambiguous) in favour of genocide.
The Western left wing got played by Hamas and Likud are now making the most of it.
Here in Australia the Green Party members of parliament (whom I otherwise support) walked out when the ruling party refused to sign a letter calling for Gazan peace. However the reason they didn’t sign is because the letter omitted any mention of Oct 7. Played.
I hope you know I wasn’t actually accusing you of being a wife beater. I thought it was the quintessential example of a loaded question and everyone knew of it… and would spark discussion about loaded questions. And how no matter what the response is, there’s an inflammatory headline that can be drawn from it that will squeak by a court of law. Apparently 1 mod didn’t know the reference.
I know, but it’s still not supporting genocide, or the violence in general.
Absolutely, they’re taking what was said out of context and turning it into propaganda.
Yup. Some of the blame rests with the American right wing too. Instead of trying to diffuse the situation, they poured fuel on the fire. They’re looking for any way to damage the left and don’t care about the cost. Instead of calling the statement insensitive victim blaming, and trying to calm things down, they lied to boost themselves and hurt others. This would not be propaganda for Hamas or Likud without the American right wing’s assistance.
I disagree. We are at an impasse but our interim discussion was productive at least.
I reported you to the mod. It seemed to be the kind of thing I was escaping Reddit from. Am glad to hear you were not being an asshole. Certainly your reasonable tone later had me confused so I am glad I mentioned it.
I think we agree the right wing is getting the upper hand and out of hand despite public sympathy for Palestinian civilians.
Some of them probably are hypocritically subscribing to the “Elders of Zion” hoax while jumping on anything remotely anti-semitic from the Left.
I do worry about a rise of anti-Semitism whether from the Left or the Right. I don’t think Germans were genetically evil and that it could not be repeated. The thirst for scapegoating is insatiable. Jews are the eternal go-to scapegoat and so I keep raising my voice amongst fellow left wingers to ensure we don’t feed that.
No worries, I guess it’s not as common as I think. I did talk with one of the other mods this morning and they understood what I was aiming for and didn’t think it should have been removed.
We do.
Boggles my mind.
Me too. Any kinda of ‘out-grouping or othering’ for that matter.