• li10@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    For some reason people seem to think they’re fundamentally smarter than people were back then.

    Yeah, you may have technically had a better education, but you’re not inherently more intelligent than the average person back then, and a genius from that time is still miles ahead of you.

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah they had less lead in their environment. They probably were actually smarter, just had less access to foundational knowledge

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know. Looking at the pyramids I’m tempted to think all they had was foundational knowledge.

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it’s been linked to systemic racist thought patterns (which are often unintentional but should be acknowledged). I explain it to people like this: take a handful of sand and turn your fist so that your palm faces perpendicular to the ground. Now release the sand slowly… What shape does it form? It isn’t rocket science.

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ancient aliens literally has Nazi origins. They didn’t just have race-science, but race-history. I guess you could call their thinking ancient-Aryans because they believed that impressive structures built by brown people must have been led by a Northern European diaspora who eventually vanished because of race-mixing.

        You can watch the History channel all you want, but nobody is going to question the Parthenon or the Colosseum. Stonehenge is the only one I can think of where Aliens had to help white people.

        • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The two things you named were built thousands of years after the pyramids are believed to have been built though. You said it yourself, people think aliens helped with Stonehenge. That’s because it’s much older and there is no written history from when it was built.

          I don’t doubt racism is factor in all sorts of aspects in life but this seems like a massive fucking stretch. Maybe come up with better examples.

          • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            https://hyperallergic.com/470795/pseudoarchaeology-and-the-racism-behind-ancient-aliens/

            Pseudoarchaeology has a pretty long and not-so-awesome background due to the profession’s colonial roots with treasure hunters, adventurers, and the like, especially in antiquarian circles.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_archaeology

            In the late 18th to 19th century archaeology became a national endeavor as personal cabinets of curios turned into national museums. People were now being hired to go out and collect artifacts to make a nation’s collection more grand and to show how far a nation’s reach extends. For example, Giovanni Battista Belzoni was hired by Henry Salt, the British consul to Egypt, to gather antiquities for Britain. In nineteenth-century Mexico, the expansion of the National Museum of Anthropology and the excavation of major archaeological ruins by Leopoldo Batres were part of the liberal regime of Porfirio Díaz to create a glorious image of Mexico’s pre-Hispanic past.[22]

            • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So that’s great evidence for racism being in archeology in general but I still don’t see the connection between that and people crediting aliens for things we don’t completely understand.

              Edit: There are definitely good examples in the article but they also use your argument about things that were built way more recently compared to things that were built before written language. Egyptians definitely built the pyramids, they’re in Egypt so by definition that’s what happened. But I really don’t believe people getting excited over the mystery around how it happened and then pointing to aliens as a possible answer is rooted in racism at all. That being said, there seems be all sorts of nefarious reasons to put that alien explanation on things that are much easier explained without aliens.

        • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, and it is hard for many people to see the direct correlation of “Chariot of the Gods” etc. with Nazis because it isn’t hitting them in the face. I try to show people that people were smart back then, too, instead of punishing these icky mindsets because they tend to be a bit reactionary anyway. Some people just don’t know any better for a variety of reasons.

      • Blóðbók@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was thinking “three ridges” first 😅 (I imagined the sand running between the four fingers of my semi-closed fist)

      • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you’re saying the pyramids are just giant rocks piled on top of each other?

        If so, then what was dropping them and how could the intricacies inside the pyramids be possible if they were just dropped on top of each other?

        • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Pyramids = basic engineering shape for a sturdy structure. Wide base, tapered top. A lot of early monumental structures were constructed with that basic concept in mind.

          • Num10ck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            its not the basic shape thats impressive, its the truly gigantic pieces that have tighter tolerances than a tesla.

          • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t think people have ever been blown away from the shape of them.

            Edit: and it’s actually really silly to think about someone who would be… “Woah! How are those things triangles???” Like what?

    • charlytune@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I probably didn’t have as good an education as the highest educated classes in most ancient Egyptian dynasties.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know about that. Intelligence is attractive and it’s a predictor of lifetime success.