• HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not with that attitude. There is no reason we can’t cultivate alternatives like PeerTube. No video platform starts with a massive library and if we actually want to take back our digital rights then we have to put our foot down and give a hard “no” to trading those rights away just because we really want to watch a particular creator on a corporate platform. It’s the only way to not only stick it to Google but also let creators know that viewers will not tolerate the likes of Google.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think the hosting is the real problem. For something like Lemmy where it’s just text it’s not too expensive, but when you need to store and stream videos for free I have to imagine most people wouldn’t be able to afford that without charging for it and the moment you start charging you can’t compete with YouTube anymore

        • jackpot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          i think the solution could be a FOSS torrenting site where everyone hosts their own videos (or maybe a stream only site?). people are already willing to fork over for netflix so maybe if the content quality was extremely high theyd shift (e.g. nebula)

          • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep, this is already a solved problem via torrents. All that’s needed is a site (like lemmy or something else) to host the links, and help with content discovery.

          • jcg@halubilo.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nebula could be a good case study in how well this would work. The content on there is of exceptional quality. To be honest, though, that’s not always what I’m looking for. Sometimes I just want a bunch of garbage rather than a little high quality content. The big social media platforms put a bunch of it in one place. I know it’s not really a good thing, but sometimes I just need background noise while I do other shit and random YouTube videos really does it for me.

            I can’t seem to find any data on how much of Nebula’s revenue is actually due to the Curiosity stream tie-in, but I know even I was wary of the $5/mo subscription without the CuriosityStream sub to sweeten the deal. So maybe even the world’s largest creator-owned streaming platform needed that investment.

        • madcaesar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          We need to crowdfund a starting base, and after that the site wouid have to charge something just be reasonable to not like asshole youtube.

          • flashgnash@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Majority of people will always choose free, convenient and what they’re used to

            If it’s not free it stands very little chance against something that is all 3