• HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not with that attitude. There is no reason we can’t cultivate alternatives like PeerTube. No video platform starts with a massive library and if we actually want to take back our digital rights then we have to put our foot down and give a hard “no” to trading those rights away just because we really want to watch a particular creator on a corporate platform. It’s the only way to not only stick it to Google but also let creators know that viewers will not tolerate the likes of Google.

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think the hosting is the real problem. For something like Lemmy where it’s just text it’s not too expensive, but when you need to store and stream videos for free I have to imagine most people wouldn’t be able to afford that without charging for it and the moment you start charging you can’t compete with YouTube anymore

      • jackpot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        i think the solution could be a FOSS torrenting site where everyone hosts their own videos (or maybe a stream only site?). people are already willing to fork over for netflix so maybe if the content quality was extremely high theyd shift (e.g. nebula)

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, this is already a solved problem via torrents. All that’s needed is a site (like lemmy or something else) to host the links, and help with content discovery.

        • jcg@halubilo.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nebula could be a good case study in how well this would work. The content on there is of exceptional quality. To be honest, though, that’s not always what I’m looking for. Sometimes I just want a bunch of garbage rather than a little high quality content. The big social media platforms put a bunch of it in one place. I know it’s not really a good thing, but sometimes I just need background noise while I do other shit and random YouTube videos really does it for me.

          I can’t seem to find any data on how much of Nebula’s revenue is actually due to the Curiosity stream tie-in, but I know even I was wary of the $5/mo subscription without the CuriosityStream sub to sweeten the deal. So maybe even the world’s largest creator-owned streaming platform needed that investment.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We need to crowdfund a starting base, and after that the site wouid have to charge something just be reasonable to not like asshole youtube.

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Majority of people will always choose free, convenient and what they’re used to

          If it’s not free it stands very little chance against something that is all 3