• AeroLemming@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If blocking ads is piracy, then ad-viewing is equated to money and showing ads while either failing to provide the service the user wanted or not providing any at all is theft.

    • mriormro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a bit of a chicken and an egg scenario. Who pays first? The user, the content creator, or the content host?

      • AntEater@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Who pays first? The user, the content creator, or the content host?

        I couldn’t care less. If my adblocker is that final straw that caused a company to go out of business, brings on the collapse of the internet as a whole, and ultimately the breakdown of western civilization, then all of it deserves to die. With that knowledge, I’d still update by block lists and donate to adblocking projects.

      • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The user “pays” the creator and host at the same time by watching an ad, so it depends on when it plays. Not sure what you’re getting at.