• Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    121
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nope. Many Chromium forks already have very good inbuilt adblockers , which won’t be affected by the MV3 stuff. On top of that, one could also use system-wide blockers such as AdGuard and DNS-level blockers (which is not even a bad idea if you’re on Windows anyway).

    • DrQuint@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man’s 3 poignant inquiries away from peddling Brave. Tread carefully folks.

    • DigitalBits@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      System wide ad blockers can’t block a lot of ads, namely same-domain ads or those that are built into the html. Much rarer than the external page kind (DNS ones) thankfully.

    • WallEx@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah surel, I’ll use the inadequate browser but fox the problems with system wide ad blockers, instead of just using a browser, that doesn’t steal my data and let’s me install addons that I want. Google is way out of bounds here imho.

      • Engywuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Use whatever suits you. I’m just saying that people already using browsers with a built-in AdBlock aren’t going to switch, because they won’t even notice the MV3 stuff.

        • WallEx@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Aren’t all those ad blockers and distribution platforms too? Heard about ABP that sell ad space for example.

          • Engywuck@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            IIRC, ABP used to whiteliste some “acceptable” ads (non invasive, etc…). Frankly, it’s been literally ages since I have used it, so I don’t know how they behave right now. I was referring to AdGuard as a system-wide adblocker, though, which is a completely different story.

    • Cossty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      As far as I know most inbuilt adblockers, don’t work very well. Especially with yt. Everytime yt does something, you would probably have to wait for new version of your browser, and even then it is questionable if it would work. With ublock origin you just click on one button and you are good to go. If somebody doesn’t know, I’m talking about refreshing your filters.

      • Engywuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m yet to see any ad since I’ve started using Brave. Din know about YouTube, I don’t use it.

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would you want to use some Google-coded, bigoted-ceo, crypto-pushing, link hijacking POS like Brave?

            • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Brave adblock is just a fork of uBlock with a whitelist for Brave’s partners.

                • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s fine but you should understand that you shouldn’t endorse an inferior product just because you don’t need anything better

                  • Engywuck@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I’ll endorse whatever I feel like. And… Inferior? Lol. Just looking at the retard UI of Firefox is enough for me (p.s., I’ve been a FF user for almost 20 year, since it still was Phoenix).

                    By the way, I’d be curious to know what would happen to FF if somewhat uBlock Origin disappeared. Equivalently, the only thing keeping FF alive (apart from sweet Google’s money) is the existence of uBlock Origin, i.e. an independent extension created and maintained by volunteers. I’m pretty sure that the day uBO dies, is the day FF disappears

      • Engywuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        As long as these browsers themselves exist. Inbuilt adblockers aren’t extension, are integral parts of the browsers, and don’t need to follow extensions’ rules.