Hi, mostly i use REHL based distros like Centos/Rocky/Oracle for the solutions i develop but it seems its time to leave…

What good server/minimal distro you use ?

Will start to test Debian stable.

  • slabber@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been using Debian for about 20 years now. Server and desktop. But I recently migrated all my server stuff to FreeBSD and I don’t think I will move back. Jails are great and provide me a convenient way to isolate my apps. On the desktop side I will stay with Debian.

  • yarr@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Debian stable. The mix of having a stable host but being able to pull in flatpak / appimage / docker containers with newer software is awesome.

    • itchy_lizard@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Debian yes, but don’t install from flatpaks or docker. Neither is secure.

      AppImage can be secure if the release is signed.

      Docker can pull images securely, but it’s disabled by default and many developers don’t sign their releases, so even if you enable it client-side there’s a risk you’ll download something malicious.

      Flatpak is never secure because it doesn’t support signing of releases at all.

      Apt is always secure because all packages must be cryptographically signed (by default).

  • voluntaryexilecat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    My vote is Archlinux. Debian is sometimes a little too “optimisitic” when backporting security fixes and upgrading from oldstable to stable always comes with manual intervention.

    Release-based distros tend to be deployed and left to fend on their own for years - when it is finally time to upgrade it is often a large manual migration process depending on the deployed software. A rolling release does not have those issues, you just keep upgrading continuously.

    Archlinux performs excellent as a lightweight server distro. Kernel updates do not affect VM hardware the same they do your laptop, so no issues with that. Same for drivers. It just, works.

    Bonus: it is extremely easy to build and maintain your own packages, so administration of many instances with customized software is very convenient.

    • Sw00$h@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You basically recommend to burn money.

      Not because of Arch itself and its quality, but because you need to constantly monitor the mailing list for issues and you need to plan a lot more downtimes due to reboot. This is not gonna happen in businesses.

  • Jcb2016@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Debian is stable. Arch is bleeding edge and vanilla. if you want something on arch you got to install it and follow the arch wiki

  • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Debian

    Debian 12 Bookworm is their best release ever, and I am seeing a lot of positive opinions about it suddenly. It may be a Ubuntu 16.04 moment.

  • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If your solutions are work/job related and need to be distributed I think your current options are SUSE or Debian. If your solution is something only you maintain, you could check out NixOS.