• corship@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That would be consequent, but usually it’s not worth the trouble.

    I’d rather leave with 20 quid less than wasting 30 min of my time.

      • corship@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s a risk reward analysis and not strictly a 1:1 hour pay relation. No one guarantees you any positive outcome here.

        Best case I get the fee removed after a short conversation.

        Worst case, I have to engage in a long drawn argument still having to pay full afterwards.

        Or anything in between, such as still having to pay full, but they’ll make this clearer in their menu.

        best case was a simple mistake and I just have to ask politely. This can be considered very unlikely in this case because the recipient has a dedicated section for the fee, indicating that they’re not going to make any change to the bill. So the risk reward is highly leaning towards the worst case as the expected outcome.

        • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m pretty sure it’s illegal for them to try to make you pay the service charge you didn’t agree to.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        My time is worth way more than 40/h when I’m out with friends trying to have a good time. I’m never going to the restaurant again and that’s it.